Sign in

← All documents

18.6 Vehicle Searches

Document Date unknown · 3 page(s)

Read as text View original PDF ↗

This is Centreville Police Department Directive 18.6 (Vehicle Searches), which sets rules officers must follow when searching vehicles. It explains searches incident to an occupant’s arrest (allowed when the arrestee is within reaching distance or when the officer reasonably believes the vehicle contains evidence related to the arrest), notes locked containers should not be opened without a warrant, and requires the search be close in time and place to the arrest. The directive also allows warrantless searches when probable cause exists (including for mobile vehicles that could leave), when vehicles are abandoned, or under the Plain View doctrine, and limits scope based on the item sought or whether a specific container is suspected. It requires CPD-authorized towing to the public works yard and officer follow-through to preserve chain of custody for evidentiary vehicles, prescribes vehicle inventories only as part of established CPD procedure (not as a pretext), addresses searches of occupants (and stop-and-frisk per Directive 29.4), and authorizes reasonable force to conduct a lawful vehicle search consistent with CPD policy.

AI-generated summary — verify against the source document.
Show the raw extracted text

Exactly as extracted, unformatted — for checking against the original. The readable version is easier to read.

Centreville Police Department
Title: Vehicle Searches Directive #: 18.6
Issued: 10.1.2016 Revised: 10.1.2016
Approved by: Charles M. Rhodes, Jr.
Chief of Police
A. Policy
Officers will search vehicles in compliance with the law and this directive.
B. Procedures
1. Search of a Vehicles Incident to an Occupant’s Arrest
a. A search of a vehicle may be conducted incident to the arrest of one or more of the vehicle’s
occupants if the:
(1) suspect is not handcuffed and is within the reaching distance of the vehicle; or
(2) officer has reason to believe there is evidence in the car which relates to the offense for which the
suspect was just arrested.
b. A search incident to the arrest of an occupant may include the person arrested, the passenger
compartment of the vehicle and any packages, containers and property, either opened or closed,
contained therein.
c. An officer may request assistance to secure the suspect at the scene or reasonably close to the scene
while he conducts the search.
d. Locked containers should not be searched without a warrant.
e. In order for the search to be valid, it must be incident to a lawful custodial arrest and be close in time
and place to the arrest.
2. Generally, vehicles may be searched without a warrant:
a. when probable cause exists that it contains seizable items;
b. when it has been abandoned; and
c. under the Plain View doctrine.
Page 1 of 3

3. Search of Vehicles Based on Probable Cause
a. A vehicle may be searched without a warrant if there is probable cause to believe that seizable
property is located within the vehicle.
b. An officer having probable cause that a vehicle contains seizable items may search a mobile vehicle
which could conceivably leave the jurisdiction before a warrant could be obtained.
c. If there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains a specific item, the reasonableness
and scope of the search will be determined by the nature of the item sought.
d. If there is probable cause to believe that:
(1) the vehicle contains contraband, the search can generally continue until all areas which could
contain the contraband have been searched; and
(2) the vehicle is being used to conceal a specific container, the search must be limited to those
locations where the container may be hidden and continued only until the container is located (at
which time a warrant will be required to open the container).
e. If a lawful arrest is made, the search may be expanded incident to the arrest.
f. A vehicle may be searched without a warrant based on probable cause:
(1) at the location it was first stopped or taken into custody; or
(2) after being removed to another location for reasons of safety, custody or convenience.
g. The time factor is not as critical in probable cause situations, especially when the vehicle is in the
custody of the CPD; however, if the search is delayed for an unusually long time, the officer may be
questioned as to why a warrant was not obtained.
h. Generally, this rule permits the search of a mobile vehicle even though there is no danger that the
vehicle may be taken or the evidence destroyed.
i. If probable cause is not obtained until after the vehicle has lost its mobility or until it was taken into
custody, a warrantless search should not be conducted.
4. Transportation of Evidentiary Vehicles
a. When a vehicle is to be held as evidence, it will be towed from the scene to the public works yard by a
CPD-authorized towing service.
b. The officer should secure the vehicle prior to towing and follow the vehicle as it is being towed to its
destination to ensure an unbroken chain of custody of evidence.
Page 2 of 3

5. Scope
a. A vehicle used to violate laws concerning the transportation of liquor, cigarettes or narcotics can be
seized without a warrant and subject to forfeiture and may be searched at any time.
b. If a vehicle is taken as evidence of a crime, either as an instrumentality (e.g. a hit-and-run homicide) or
as the fruit of a crime (e.g., a stolen car), it may be subject to a later, more careful examination just as
is any other lawfully seized item.
c. An abandoned vehicle may be seized and searched without a warrant or probable cause.
d. Vehicle Inventories
(1) The inventory of vehicles and other objects under MSP control, where officers have lawful
custody, may be done to protect the owner against loss, to avoid a claim of destruction and to
protect officers against any hidden danger.
(2) Officers cannot assume custody as a pretext for inventory where such an inventory is not
reasonably necessary.
(3) The inventory must be carried out as part of established CPD procedure.
e. Vehicle Occupants
(1) Evidence of probable cause justifying a search of a vehicle does not necessarily empower an officer
to search occupants who have not been arrested.
(2) A thorough search of an occupant may be justified only if the officer has probable cause to believe
that he possesses evidence of a criminal offense.
(3) The officer may conduct a stop and frisk of a vehicle occupant per Directive 29.4.
f. The Plain View doctrine applies to all vehicles.
6. Force
a. If an officer has a legal right to search a vehicle and if the occupant refuses to allow him to proceed, he
may use whatever force is reasonable and necessary to affect the search and must be in accordance
with CPD Policy.
Page 3 of 3
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.