Sign in

← All documents

18.1 Search and Seizure in General

Document Date unknown · 3 page(s)

Read as text View original PDF ↗

This is Centreville Police Department Directive 18.1, titled "Search and Seizure in General," issued and revised 10/1/2016 and approved by the Chief of Police. It states the purpose (to give officers a brief overview of constitutional requirements) and the policy (officers must follow constitutional and statutory requirements when conducting searches). The directive summarizes constitutional protections (Fourth Amendment and its incorporation via the Fourteenth Amendment), explains the exclusionary rule, defines probable cause and when it must exist, lists recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement (consent, exigent circumstances, fresh pursuit, motor vehicle searches, plain view, search incident to arrest, stop & frisk), advises officers to contact the State’s Attorney for guidance, and directs readers to OPS 16.02 for specific search-warrant requirements.

AI-generated summary — verify against the source document.
Show the raw extracted text

Exactly as extracted, unformatted — for checking against the original. The readable version is easier to read.

Centreville Police Department
Title: Search and Seizure in General Directive #: 18.1
Issued: 10.1.2016 Revised: 10.1.2016
Approved by: Charles M. Rhodes, Jr.
Chief of Police
A. Purpose
To provide officers with a brief overview of constitutional requirements for search and seizure.
B. Policy
Officers will conduct all searches while following constitutional and statutory requirements.
C. Procedures
1. Introduction
a. Due to the dynamic nature of the subject, this directive is not intended to provide in-depth
information on search and seizure law.
b. Officers should contact the State’s Attorney’s Office for guidance on any search-related questions.
2. Constitutional Protections
a. The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution states that “The right of the people to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,
and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
b. Although the Fourth Amendment technically applies only to federal law enforcement officers, the Due
Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment "incorporated" most of the important elements of the
Bill of Rights and made them applicable to the states.
c. To remain within the requirements of the Constitution, an officer must always consider the
reasonableness and legal justification of any search and, when seeking a warrant, the accurate
descriptions of the place to be searched and the places and things to be seized. .
Page 1 of 3

d. Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained during an unreasonable search and seizure generally
cannot be used in a criminal trial.
3. Probable Cause
a. Probable cause must exist to justify any search.
b. Probable cause means that, when viewed in the totality of the circumstances, “there is a fair
probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a specified place.”
c. Searches may be conducted pursuant to the authority of a search warrant, upon receipt of proper
consent, or in conjunction with the various exceptions to the warrant requirements, (e.g., incident to
arrest, vehicle searches, stop and frisk, abandoned property).
d. The Supreme Court has ruled that, barring these specific exceptions, all searches without a warrant
are unreasonable. Each exception to the warrant requirement imposes its own unique set of
guidelines which must be followed.
e. The following exceptions to the warrant requirement are recognized by the Supreme Court; detailed
information may be found by clicking on the case name.
(1) CONSENT:
• an officer may conduct a search with the consent of a person who has the authority to give
consent and who knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily consents to the search without
threats or promises of any kind.
(2) EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES:
• an officer does not need to obtain a warrant prior to entering a location if he believes that
his entry is necessary to save a life.
(3) FRESH PURSUIT:
• an officer may enter a location if he is in pursuit of a suspect.
(4) MOTOR VEHICLES:
• an officer may search any parts of a vehicle that he has probable cause to believe contains
contraband, controlled substances or criminal evidence.
Page 2 of 3

(5) PLAIN VIEW:
• a warrant is generally not required if the items that is seized is within plain view of the
officer.
(6) SEARCH INCIDENT TO LAWFUL ARREST:
• an officer may search a person he has arrested and may search the vehicle the vehicle the
person occupied in certain circumstances.
(7) STOP & FRISK:
• a warrant is not required for an officer to stop a person perform a check for weapons if the
officer has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing or is about
to commit a crime and that the person may be armed and dangerous.
4. Search Warrants
The specific requirements for search warrants are located in OPS 16.02.
Page 3 of 3
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.