02_21_24_pc_web_packet_0.pdf

Exactly as extracted, unformatted — for checking against the original. The readable version is easier to read.

CENTREVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
February 21, 2024
Liberty Building - 2nd Floor
107 North Liberty Street
7:00 p.m.
A G E N D A
I. CALL TO ORDER – Kara Willis – Chair
II. Chair’s Announcements
III. Review of Minutes from Previous Meetings
a. October 18, 2023 meeting minutes
b. November 1, 2023 work session minutes
c. November 15, 2023 work session minutes
d. December 6, 2023 work session minutes
IV. Opening Statement
V. Citizen Comment (Citizens are requested to keep their comments to three minutes)
VI. Appearances
a. Preliminary Site Plan Submittal – 216 N. Commerce Street, Mixed-Use Building; Tred
Avon Partners, LLC, Owner; Steve Layden, P.E., LEED AP, Dumb Home, LLC
VII. New Business
a. Schedule of tasks - discussion
VIII. Old Business
IX. Zoning Issues – Discussion
X. Miscellaneous Business / Correspondence
a. Approved Building Permit lists issued October, November and December 2023, January
2024
XI. Citizen Comment (Citizens are requested to keep their comments to three minutes)
XII. Council Member Report
XIII. Adjournment

Dumb Home, LLC
309 Windsor Ave
Centreville, MD 21617
301-529-2368
dumbhome@gmail.com
compacthomeplans.com
www.dumbhome.com
January 19, 2024
Town of Centreville Planning Commission
Kara Voight , Chair
101 Lawyer’s Row
Centreville, MD 21617
RE: Site Plan Planning Commission Submittal – Tred Avon Partners, LLC
216 N Commerce St Mixed-Use Building
Dear Ms. Voight:
Please accept this site plan submission for review and placement on the February 21st Planning
Commission agenda. We are providing 10 copies of the items listed below (one full size and nine
11x17) as well as digital scans:
• Schematic Design rendering and elevations by Torchio Architects
• “Site and Construction Plan” Sheets 1-9
• Stormwater Management Narrative
Note that we will be sending the engineering plans and the complete SWM report to QAC Department
of Public Works staff and the Soil Conservation District for review. Before addressing the TAC
comments, which we received on 1/8/2024, we wish to bring a few particular design choices that may
be relevant to your evaluation of our design.
A. The site layout features a building-forward layout with nine parking spaces in the rear. As
shown on Sheet 1 of the Site Plan, the required parking for the building is 14 spaces, and we are
taking credit for shared parking under 170-32 B. 3. since the three required commercial spaces
will only be in use during business hours, when the parking demand for the apartments is
reduced. We also believe the Centreville parking requirements are rather generous, so under
170-32 B. 2, we are requesting a 2-space reduction by using the Anne Arundel County parking
standards. With these two adjustments, the 14 spaces required is reduced to 9, matching the
number proposed. The plan also lists several locations of adjacent public parking that are
available to building users.
B. We are showing a one-way driveway, which is similar to conditions at the QAC Arts Council
building and the driveway that serves the Thompson & Richard parking area (next to the new
courthouse). We anticipate that during the rare circumstance where a car is entering the site
while one is exiting, the exiting car would have right of way while the entering car on
Commerce Street would temporarily pause traffic. Because the Miles Insurance building is set
back roughly 40 feet, entering traffic has clear site lines to determine if there is any exiting
traffic coming. It should be noted that the traffic light at Water Street creates a platooning
effect to allow reasonably patient drivers adequate opportunities to exit the driveway.

Tred Avon Partners – 216 N. Commerce St
January 19, 2024
Page 2
C. Based on trash and recycling pickup at DMS’s building (a similarly-sized mixed use building), we
believe trash trucks would back into the site and empty the bins located behind the building as
shown on Site Plan Sheet 3. We are planning for three trash cans and three recycling cans to
serve all 6 units.
D. The existing driveway serving the residence on the Echo 5 lot to the north is partly located on
the subject property. Site Plan Sheet 2 shows a portion of the encroachment being removed
with 2 feet of gravel driveway remaining on the subject property. This approach leaves a
minimum of 9’ of gravel to serve the Echo 5 house, not including their concrete walk. We
envision providing some small shrubs along the building to screen the foundation, and it is likely
that some HVAC will be placed within that strip of landscaping as well.
In reference to the TAC comments from our meeting on December 11, we offer the following:
1. Submitted project is a principle permitted use under § 170-22 A-10. The ground floor is designated
for commercial use.
RESPONSE: So noted.
2. Per queries in the Applicant’s cover:
3. This parking calculation should be acceptable on precedence and code, this is in the CBD and the
applicant can also prevail on § 170-22 F inasmuch as the top deck of the State parking garage is
available under agreement with the Town. We should ask the applicant if he inquired whether the
County lot in the rear of the site can be cited for offsite calculations. It is clear the access road cannot be
extended into that lot, but pedestrian access might.
RESPONSE: Thank you for mentioning the availability of the parking deck. We believe that
between the on-site parking, the parking deck, nearby on-street spaces near Courthouse
Square, and the proximity of the Department of Health parking lot, adequate provisions have
been made. Please note the addition of a woodchip path in the location of an existing informal
pathway between the subject lot and the DEH parking lot on Sheet 3 of the site plan.
4. The front yard setback should be acceptable per § 170-22 E (1) as it sits where the prior structure was
(see attached 2004 aerial). Also note that the Miles Insurance building front sits on the line between the
County
RESPONSE: So noted. We believe we've struck a good balance between the aesthetic
constraints of the existing buildings on that block, the need to provide room for the water
meter in the front yard, and the minimum setback from the power lines in terms of
construction safety.
5. The drive access lane does have a sidewalk along it per § 170-22 E (2) however it is not ADA
accessible from Commerce Street as currently designed….It can however be made to be so by separating
the risers into the commercial from a ramped walk to the rear. The engineer should take a look at that
condition. We should note as to the applicant’s suggestion for a sign on Commerce alerting its traffic to
the conflict with traffic exiting the site, the town has no authority to place signs and the MSHA would
have to give approval. It should be noted that the Miles Insurance drive entry and the entry to the ECHO
5 lot mirror that proposed by the applicant. [While presumably beyond the prevue of the Town review
authority, both Miles and Tred Avon’s ingress and egress issues could be eased by a private shared drive
agreement for one-way use. This type of agreement could also be made with ECHO5 but with less

Tred Avon Partners – 216 N. Commerce St
January 19, 2024
Page 3
workable width.] The nature of the commercial tenant is the wild card as a very popular use will
exacerbate the potential congestion.
RESPONSE: We have redesigned the grades and the building entrance as you suggest to ensure
a handicap accessible pathway to the building entrance located midway on the south side. The
developer considered shared entrance with the neighboring Miles insurance Building, but chose
to keep the project unencumbered by cross easements in that fashion. In addition, the grade
change between the two lots would have been a complicating Factor.
6. Changing the railing along the walkway to the same as shown on the balconies would have more
consistency in the design of the structure and with the historic district.
RESPONSE: Thank you for the feedback. Due to the revised grades, the guard rail along the
curb is no longer needed. Hand rails that match the railings of the balconies are now show on
the architectural drawings.
7. I do not see any ADA access from the handicapped space in the parking lot to the sidewalk. There are
no doors in the east elevation therefore the south elevation door must be accessible.
RESPONSE: The sidewalk as graded, is ADA accessible without the need for a particular ramp by
virtue of a gradual tapering curb adjacent to the north side of the trash corral. We have added a
keynote clarifying that this is an accessible route to Sheet 4 of the Site Plans.
8. Trench repair in Commerce shall be in accordance with MSHA repair standards.
RESPONSE: So noted. The applicable detail is included on sheet 7 of the Site Plans.
9. 4” meter vault detail including in & out stenciling.
RESPONSE: The town provided a 6” meter vault which is shown on Sheet 6. We have added a
note to stencil on the flow direction. We are looking into whether a 6’ service line and meter is
required or whether 4” would be adequate. If we're able to go with 4”, we talked with Gillespie
precast, and they believe the meter vault could be shrunk to 4 ft x 6 ft inside. In either case, we
would prefer the headroom in the vault to be approved at 6 ft rather than the 7 ft currently
shown. With space at a premium in the front yard, the vault currently sits on the foundation
footer directly adjacent to the basement foundation wall. With a vault that provides 7 ft of
headroom (8’-2” tall), the vault would interfere with the siding and waterproofing on the front
of the building. A lower vault means the top slab sits down below the siding. We look forward
to finalizing these details later in the approval/permitting process.
10. 6” sewer laterals are used in Commerce Street.
RESPONSE: Thank you for that information, we have updated the notes on sheet 6 accordingly.
11. Has the applicant received comments from QAC Stormwater Management?
RESPONSE: We have preliminary verbal comments based on our sketch plan dated December
1st. Now that we have refined the design and provided a stormwater management report, we
are resubmitting the project for a detailed review.
12. The subject property currently has one water/sewer allocation. A minimum of five additional
allocations will be required to be purchased by the property owner to service the currently proposed
structure. The commercial use may require additional allocations to be purchased in the future, the Town
reserves the option to recalculate based on use.

Tred Avon Partners – 216 N. Commerce St
January 19, 2024
Page 4
RESPONSE: So noted. We trust that the town will work with the developer to prepare a public
works agreement after planning commission approval.
The developer, Greg Torchio and I look forward to attending the Planning Commission meeting to
provide additional insight into the building and site plans, as well as answering any questions you may
have. We look forward to everyone’s feedback!
Sincerely,
Steve Layden, P.E., LEED AP

COMMERCE STREET VIEW
WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
01
:: 216 NORTH COMMERCE STREET MIXED USE BUILDING :: SCHEMATIC DESIGN :: January 18, 2024
205 E. Water Street, Suite A, Centreville, Maryland 21617 - 410.758.1000 COPYRIGHT TORCHIO ARCHITECTS, INC. 2024
"4/3
11-'33
MATERIALS
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
PVC TRIM
VINYL OR CEMENT BOARD SIDING
ALUMINUM RAILINGS
CONCRETE FOUNDATION
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOFING (NOT VISIBLE)

SITE AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS
216 N COMMERCE ST MIXED-USE BUILDING
SITE, SEC, STORMWATER MANAGAGEMENT, AND UTILITY PLANS
SITE NOTES
D
R
N
W
1. PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS DESIGNATED AS TAX MAP 44C,GRID 8, PARCEL 778. O
T
R
2. DEED REFERENCE: 4249/130 AND PLAT REFERENCE: E
T
S
3. THIS SITE IS ZONED CBD - CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT H E
C
O
3.1. FRONT SETBACK = 0 FEET T
3.2. SIDE SETBACK = 0 FEET PLAN
3.3. REAR SETBACK = 5 FEET
4. EXISTING USE: VACANT
5. PROPOSED USE: MIXED COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT
6. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A SURVEY TITLED, "SURVEY ON THE
LANDS OF TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC" PREPARED BY MICHAEL A. SCOTT, INC DATED
OCTOBER, 2023.
RD
7. TOPOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED FROM THE AFOREMENTIONED SURVEY AND IS ON AN
ASSUMED HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATUM.
8. THE PROPERTY IS SERVED BY THE PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER.
9. SOILS WITHIN THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE CONSIST ENTIRELY OF INGLESIDE SANDY LOAM
(IgA), HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A, K FACTOR 0.15, AS PER THE USDA-NRCS WEB SOIL
SITE
SURVEY AS OF OCTOBER 2023.
SITE STATISTICS
10. THE PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE ONE PERCENT CHANCE FLOOD PLAIN
ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY'S F.I.R.M. MAP FOR
TOTAL SITE AREA = (cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:25)(cid:25)(cid:25)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:147) (cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:147)
QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, PANEL NO. 24035C0212D, DATED: 11/05/2014.
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA (6.5%) = (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:147) (cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:147)
11. THE PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY CRITICAL AREA. IMPERVIOUS AREA TO BE REMOVED = (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:3)(cid:147) (cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:147)
12. THERE APPEAR TO BE NO NON-TIDAL WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY. IMPERVIOUS AREA TO BE ADDED = (cid:26)(cid:15)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:3)(cid:147) (cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:147)
RESULTING IMPERVIOUS AREA (83.5%) = (cid:26)(cid:15)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:3)(cid:147) (cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:25)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:147)
13. THERE ARE NO STEEP SLOPES ON THE PROPERTY.
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA (85%) = (cid:26)(cid:15)(cid:22)(cid:25)(cid:25)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:3)(cid:147) (cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:147)
14. NO FOREST IS PROPOSED TO BE DISTURBED AS PART OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
15. THE PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO CONTAIN RARE, THREATENED OR ENDANGERED TO
US
301 216 N COMMERCE ST MIXED-USE BUILDING
SPECIES HABITAT AND IS NOT MAPPED AS A SENSITIVE SPECIES PROJECT REVIEW AREA PARKING CALCULATIONS REVISED 12/11/2023
AS OF NOVEMBER 2023.
VICINITY MAP
900 S.F. COMMERCIAL @ 1 SPACE PER 300 SF = 3 SPACES
SCALE: 1" = 1000' ONE 1-BR RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT @ 1.5 SPACES EACH = 1.5 SPACES
GENERAL NOTES
FOUR 2-BR RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS @ 2.25 SPACES EACH = 9 SPACES
TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PER TOWN CODE = 14 SPACES
1. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND
WE ARE NOT AWARE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON THE PROPERTY. NO GUARANTEE TO THE
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
ACCURACY OF THE LOCATION (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL) IS MADE BY THE ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO SHARED PARKING CREDIT PER 170-32 B. 3. FOR OFFSET COMMERCIAL
FIELD VERIFY AND TEST PIT AS NEEDED TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES. THIS AND RESIDENTIAL PARKING TIMES = 3 SPACE REDUCTION
SHALL BE DONE AS PART OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE WORK SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS. ANY DAMAGE SHEET # DESCRIPTION REDUCED PARKING CREDIT PER 170-32 B. 2. BASED ON ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
INCURRED TO SUCH UTILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. PARKING STANDARDS (14% REDUCTION) 2 SPACE REDUCTION
1 TITLE SHEET
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO THE START OF 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN (ONE 1-BR APT. @ 1 SPC./UNIT + FOUR 2-BR APTS. @ 2 SPC./UNIT
CONSTRUCTION TO SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING: 3 SITE PLAN 1 + 8 = 9 SPACES REQUIRED FOR DWELLINGS IN AA COUNTY PER 18-3-104
4 GRADING & SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN COMPARED TO 11 SPACES REQUIRED NY CENTREVILLE CODE)
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 410-758-1180 5 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 410-758-0925 6 UTILITY PLAN NET REQUIRED PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = 9 SPACES
DELMARVA POWER 410-758-0830 7 SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
MISS UTILITY 800-441-8355 8 STORMWATER DETAILS SPACES PROVIDED = 9 SPACES
DUMB HOME, LLC 1-410-758-2237 9 STORMTECH DETAILS NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE
COURTHOUSE SQUARE AREA, AS WELL AS OFFSITE SPACES BEING AVAILABLE ON AT
THE LIBERTY STREET RAISED PARKING DECK AND IN THE ADJACENT DEPARTMENT
3. ALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADS SHALL BE MARKED FOR TRAFFIC AND OWNER / DEVELOPER PREMISE ADDRESS OF HEALTH PARKING LOT.
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION VI OF THE MANUAL
ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.
TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC 216 N COMMERCE ST
4. ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TOWN OF PO BOX 387 CENVREVILLE, MD 21617
CENTREVILLE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.
11 MARCIA LN
5. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES ALL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS, UNLESS DORSET, VT 05251
SAID DEVIATION IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN (443) 480-2532
PERMISSION FROM THE ENGINEER IF A DEVIATION OF THE PLAN IS NECESSARY.
SURVEYOR ENGINEER
6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SMOOTHLY GRADED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN THE DIRECTION
PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE
OF FLOW ARROWS, SPOT GRADES, AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON AND STABILIZED WITH TOPSOIL,
SEED, AND MULCH. IF SETTLEMENT OCCURS, TOPSOIL, SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL BE REPEATED MICHAEL A. SCOTT, INC. DUMB HOME, LLC
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED BY UNTIL SETTLEMENT SUBSIDES (SEE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS). 400 S CROSS ST, STE 4 309 WINDSOR AVE
THE CENTREVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY 7. ALL TRASH, TREES, DEMOLITION DEBRIS, AND UNDERBRUSH ARE TO BE CLEARED AND REMOVED OFF CHESTERTOWN, MD 21620 CENTREVILLE, MD 21617
OF , 20 . SITE TO AN APPROVED DUMP SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. PHONE: (410) 778-2310 PHONE: (301) 529-2368
8. ANY EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL PLACED OUTSIDE OF THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAN
SHALL MEET APPROVAL OF THE TOWN AND QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY INSPECTORS AND ENGINEER.
.
9. ANY EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTATION THAT IS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
SIGNATURE DATE
REPLACED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
10. ALL FILL AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF PAVEMENT, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AND OTHER AREAS AS
DESIGNATED ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY AND LAID
DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY AND COMPACTED IN 8" MAXIMUM LIFTS.
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL
SERVICES OFFICE OF THE FIRE 11. ALL FILL AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF WALKS, PATIOS, ETC. SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90% MODIFIED
PROCTOR DENSITY AND LAID AND COMPACTED IN 8" MAXIMUM LIFTS. SITE INFORMATION:
MARSHAL CERTIFICATE
12. IF POSSIBLE, EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES SHALL NOT REMAIN OPEN OVERNIGHT. IF IT IS NECESSARY
FOR TRENCHES TO REMAIN OPEN, STEEL PLATES, CAPABLE OF BEARING TRAFFIC, SHALL BE USED TO TOTAL SITE AREA 8,666 SQ.FT.
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED BY THE QUEEN
COMPLETELY COVER THE TRENCH OR SAFETY FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (ONSITE) 8,666 SQ.FT
ANNE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES - OFFICE OF
THE FIRE MARSHAL ON THE DAY OF , 20 . THE EXCAVATION OR TRENCH. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 7,240 SQ.FT
VEGETATIVELY STABILIZED AREA 1,426 SQ.FT
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY SWM INSPECTOR AND THE TOWN OF
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (OFFSITE) 50 SQ.FT
CENTREVILLE WITH A SET OF RED-LINED AS-BUILTS OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITIES. RED
OFFSITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 50 SQ.FT
LINES SHALL SHOW THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING AND
JEFFREY MORGAN, FIRE MARSHAL . TOTAL LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE 8,716 SQ.FT
STRUCTURES AS SURVEYED, BEFORE BEING BACKFILLED.
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC TITLE SHEET SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 1
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE 1" = 60' dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

LEGEND
EXISTING
X
SS S
C/O
W
M
SOIL BORING LOCATION
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
SILT FENCE
SUPER SILT FENCE
FILTER LOG
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMP. STOCKPILE LOCATION
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 2
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE 1" = 20' dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

S.H.A.MIXNo.2
LEGEND 5'-6" 1"RADIUS 6" CONCRETEOR
PRECAST 1 SAWCUTEX.CURBTONEARESTJOINTANDPOURNEW3'RADIUSCURBANDNOSEDOWN
FLUSHWITHPROPOSEDSIDEWALK.
EXISTING PROPOSED FINISHEDGRADE 2MAX. SCORE 1"RADIUSNOSING 2 SAWCUTEX.ASPHALTANDPAVEPROPOSEDCONCRETEAPRONFLUSH.
ORBUILDING PAVEMENT 6"
3 SEEELECTRICALPLANSFORPROPOSEDWALL-MOUNTEDPARKINGLOTLIGHTING.
4"THICK
6" ASPHALT SUB-GRADE HANDICAPPARKINGSIGNFASTENEDTOBUILDINGWALLPERDETAILTHISSHEET.
4"CR-6 PAVEMENT
9'x9'FENCEDTRASHCORRAL.FENCINGSHALLBE5'HIGHWHITEVINYLPEROWNERWITH
18"
A4'WIDELATCHINGDOOR.CONCRETEPADSHALLBE4"CONCRETEON4"CR-6PER
VARIES
20 SIDEWALKDETAILTHISSHEET.
21
84"
1'
SUBGRADEANDCR-6 5'x2'DETECTABLEWARNINGSURFACEPERMSHADETAIL655.40ONSHEET7.
SUB-BASE
TOBECOMPACTEDTO
1.5
95MODIFIED BIKERACKOROPTIONAL8'x9'MULCHEDPLANTINGBED.
9 " PROCTORDENSITY SUBGRADEANDCURB
BASETOBECOMPACTED SEEARCHITECTURALSFORHANDRAILTHATLIMITSACCESSFROMSTREETSIDEONLY.
TO95MODIFIED 3"BANKRUN
NOTES: CONCRETEMD. PROCTORCOMPACTION GRAVELORCR-6 PROVIDESAFETYCONESANDWARNINGSIGNAGETODIRECTPEDESTRIANAWAYFROM
1) PROVIDECONTROLJOINTSEVERY5'ANDEXPANSION 4" S.H.A.MIXNO.2 CONSTRUCTIONZONE
JOINTSEVERY15'. 6" 3000PSI28DAY 2) PROVIDEABROOMFINISH. COMPRESSIVE AMERICANHOLLY ILEXOPACA, 8'HIGH
STRAIGHT6"CURBDETAIL
3) ALLWALKSSHALLMEETAPPLICABLEADASTANDARDS. STRENGTH
SWEETBAYMAGNOLIA, MAGNOLIAVIRGINIANA, 6'HIGH
4) THISSECTIONISNOTAPPROPRIATEFORTRAFFIC
NOTTOSCALE
BEARINGLOCATIONSORATDUMPSTERPADS.
MONOLITHICSIDEWALKANDCURBDETAIL
X X
SS S SS
CO CO
W W
M M
O.W.
RD
E
E
SOILBORINGLOCATION
1
2
1
VARIES 5'-0" 1'-0"
2MAXSLOPE
4"(6"@DRIVEWAYSW6X6
WELDEDWIREMESH(GAGE10)
4"CR-6BASE
4000PSICONCRETE
(6"CR-6UNDERDRIVEWAYS)
PREFORMEDEXPANSION 12"
JOINTMATERIAL
4"MIN.
4"CR-6BASE
(6"CR-6UNDERDRIVEWAYS)
EXPANSIONJOINTDETAIL
GENERALNOTE:
1.CONSTRUCTIONJOINTSAT5'INTERVALS.
2.EXPANSIONJOINTSAT25'INTERVALS.
SIDEWALKDETAIL
NOTTOSCALE
APPROVEDBY: APPROVEDBY: REVISIONS: DATE: DumbHome,LLC SITEPLAN SHEET:
ProfessionalCertification:
DECEMBER1,2023
Iherebycertifythatthese 309WindsorAve
1192024 ADDRESSTACCOMMENTS,SUBMITFORPLAN.COM.
TOWNOF SCALE: documentswere Centreville,MD21617 216NCOMMERCEST 3
preparedorapprovedby
TOWNOFCENTREVILLEENGINEER DATE QACo. DEPT.OFPUBLICWORKS DATE 1"=20' dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me,andthatIamaduly MIXED-USEBUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensedProfessional
MARYLAND APPROVEDBY: JOBNUMBER: Engineerunderthelaws 301-529-2368
3RDELECTIONDISTRICT,QUEENANNE'SCOUNTY,MD
23-013
oftheStateofMaryland,
LicenseNo.31184, TAXMAP44C,GRID8,PARCEL778 of 9
DESIGNER:
ExpirationDate:1-16-25. DATE: PREPAREDFOR:TREDAVONPARTNERS,LLC
QACo. SOILCONSERVATIONSERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024
"5.7
4
5
6
7
8
9
7'-0"LONG,370LBS.,TWO58"X18"ANCHORPINS.
SPECIFICATIONSFORQUALITY:SMOOTHSTEELFORM A
FINISH,HIGHSTRENGTH-4500P.S.I.
B
TYPICALPARKINGBLOCKDETAIL
NOTTOSCALE
NOTES:
1. SIGNSHALLMEETTHEMUTCD
STANDARDSFORANR7-1SIGN.
2. PAINTSHALLBEREDONWHITE.
3. SIGNINSTALLEDIONBUILDINGWALL
WITHBOTTOMEDGE6'-0"ABOVE
WALK
ALUMINUM
SIGNSTOCK
COMPACTEDFILLORSUBGRADE
WITH
GRAPHICS
PERMUTCD
REQUIREMENTS
TREECANOPYCALCULATIONS
TOTALSITEAREA= (cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:25)(cid:25)(cid:25)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:147)
PERCENTAGEOFTREECOVERREQUIRED(15)= (cid:20)(cid:15)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:147)
SEEPLANFOR
PROPOSEDTREES
ARROWDIRECTION
1MEDIUMTREE(900SFPERTABLEA) 900SF
1SMALLTREE(400SF) 400SF
TOTALPROPOSEDTREECANOPY 1,300SF
PARTIALELEVATION
NOTTOSCALE
NOPARKINGSIGNDETAIL
NOTTOSCALE

SCD PLAN INFORMATION GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL
LEGEND SITE INFORMATION:
1 SAWCUT EX. CURB TO NEAREST JOINT AND POUR NEW 3' RADIUS CURB AND NOSE DOWN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL
COUNTY: QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY
FLUSH WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALK. PERMIT FOR STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (NPDES NUMBER MDRC,
EXISTING PROPOSED APPROVING AUTHORITY: QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY SCD STATE DISCHARGE PERMIT NUMBER 14GP). TOTAL SITE AREA 8,666 SQ.FT.
2 SAWCUT EX. ASPHALT AND PAVE PROPOSED CONCRETE APRON FLUSH.
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (ONSITE) 8,666 SQ.FT
OWNER'S NAME: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
OWNER'S ADDRESS: PO BOX 387 3 4' LONG HANDICAP RAMP (MAX SLOPE 12:1 OR 8.33%). 1) UTILIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SITE DESIGN PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 7,240 SQ.FT
VEGETATIVELY STABILIZED AREA 1,426 SQ.FT
111 MARCIA LN 4 CURB NOSE-DOWN BETWEEN INLET AND CONCRETE DRIVE APRON. 2) MAINTENANCE OF LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO PROTECT NATURAL AREAS LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (OFFSITE) 50 SQ.FT
DORSET, VT 05251
5 CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT NO SIDEWALK SLOPE EXCEEDS 5% IN ANY 3) CONTROL OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES OFFSITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 50 SQ.FT
DEVELOPER'S NAME: SAME AS OWNER DIRECTION BETWEEN THE SIDE DOOR AND THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE. TOTAL LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE 8,716 SQ.FT
20 DEVELOPER'S ADDRESS: 4) EVALUATION AND APPROPRIATE LIMITATION OF SITE CLEARING
6 TAPER CURB FROM 0" HIGH AT 99.9 GRADE TO 6" HIGH AT 99.3 GRADE.
21 STANDARD STABILIZATION NOTE
5) EVALUATION AND DESIGNATION OF SITE AREA FOR PHASING OR SEQUENCING
7 LOD AND SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY LINE, OR AS CLOSE AS
1.5%
FEASIBLE. SHOWN OFFSET FOR CLARITY. "FOLLOWING INITIAL SOIL DISTURBANCE OR
DEVELOPER'S PHONE: 443-480-2532 6) IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS AT HIGH RISK FOR EROSION AND ADVANCED STABILIZATION
8 PLACE SILT FENCE 1' INSIDE PROPERTY LINE AND USE EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND 1' TECHNIQUES TO BE USED REDISTURBANCE, PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY
PLAN: MIXED COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL APRTMENTS WIDE SOD STRIPS TO CREATE A DIVERSION BERM THAT ROUTES CLEAN OVERLAND STABILIZATION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN THREE
RUNOFF TOWARD COMMERCE ST. 7) IDENTIFICATION OF STEEP SLOPES AND DESIGNATION OF LIMITATIONS ON CLEARING THEM CALENDAR DAYS AS TO THE SURFACE OF ALL PERIMETER
FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: STEVE LAYDEN, P.E. CONTROLS, DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES,
PHONE: 301-529-2368 8) EVALUATION AND DESIGNATION OF STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS AND TIME LIMITS AND AND ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1
PROTECTION MEASURES FOR DISCHARGES TO THE CHESAPEAKE BAY, IMPAIRED WATERS OR
VERTICAL (3:1); AND SEVEN DAYS AS TO ALL OTHER
WATERS WITH AN ESTABLISHED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL).
CONTRACTOR'S NAME: DISTURBED OR GRADED AREAS ON THE PROJECT SITE."
CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS:
CONTRACTOR'S PHONE: NOTE:
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
X X SITE NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:
WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED.
SCD APPROVAL NUMBER:
SS S SS
C/O C/O
W W
M M
O.W.
RD
> >
E
E
SOIL BORING LOCATION
AuB HSG C
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LOD
SILT FENCE SF
SUPER SILT FENCE SSF
FILTER LOG FL-8
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMP. STOCKPILE LOCATION
1. CONTACT THE QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AT 1-410-758-0925 AND THE TOWN OF 2 WEEKS
CENTREVILLE DPW AT 410-758-1180, A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO
SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
2. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND PERIMETER CONTROLS PER PLAN. (SILT FENCE AND FILTER 3 DAYS
LOGS ALONG COMMERCE STREET MUST WAIT UNTIL AFTER THE SIDEWALK DEMOLITION IN ITEM 3.)
3. DEMOLISH EXISTING SIDEWALK AND WATER METER PIT. TEST PIT EXISTING WATER AND SEWER STUBS TO VERIFY 1 WEEK
EXISTING CONDITIONS. IF NECESSARY, SAWCUT THE ROAD PAVEMENT AND CONNECT A NEW WATER SERVICE AND
PROVIDE A STUB INTO THE SITE. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH STRUCTURAL FILL AND REPAIR PER MSHA DETAIL ASAP TO
MINIMIZE THE NEED TO COVER TRENCH WITH PLATES. INSTALL REMAINING SILT FENCE AND FILTER LOGS &
REFRESH STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IF NECESSARY.
4. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE, WITH ALL MATERIAL REMOVED FROM THE SITE TO EITHER AN APPROVED RUBBLE FILL 1 DAY
SITE OR OFFSITE TOPSOIL STOCKPILE LOCATION.
5. CONSTRUCT STORMTECH UNDERGROUND CHAMBER STORMWATER FACILITY INCLUDING MANHOLE AND PIPE STUBS 1 WEEK
OUT TOWARD INLETS. PROVIDE TEMPORARY PIPE CAPS. UTILIZE SOIL STOCKPILE AREA #1 DURING EXCAVATION,
AND RELOCATE ANY REMAINING STOCKPILED MATERIALS TO AREA #2 AFTER BACKFILLING THE SYSTEM.
6. EXCAVATE FOR BUILDING FOUNDATION AND WATER METER VAULT. SOILS CAN BE STOCKPILED IN STOCKPILE AREA 2 DAYS
#2 AS NEEDED TO CREATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE MIMICKING EXISTING CONDTIIONS AND TO ALLOW FOR BACKFILL
AROUND THE FOUNDATION.
7. CONSTRUCT FOOTERS, BASEMENT FOUNDATION, AND SET WATER METER VAULT IN PLACE. 1 WEEK
8. EXTEND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER SERVICE PIPES INTO BASEMENT. BACKFILL FOUNDATION, REMOVING 1 DAY
STOCKPILE AREA #2.
9. CONSTRUCT PROPOSED BUILDING. 9 MONTHS
10. THIS ITEM CAN BE PERFORMED AT ANY TIME DURING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION:INSTALL DRY UTILITIES, INCLUDING 1 WEEK
CONDUIT, IF NECESSARY.
11. AS BUILDING CONSTRUCTION IS WRAPPING UP, INSTALL REMAINING STORM DRAIN PIPES, INLETS AND ROOF DRAINS, 3 DAYS
CONNECTING INLETS TO THE PRE-BUILT STORMTECH SYSTEM. PROVIDE 60 mil EPDM SHEET MATERIAL UNDER
GRATES TO PREVENT WATER FROM ENTERING THE UNDERGROUND CHAMBER AT THIS TIME. CONNECT BUILDING
ROOF DRAINS TO UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN PIPES.
12. FINE GRADE PAVED AREAS AND REMOVE EXCESS MATERIAL FROM STOCKPILE AREA #2 TO AN APPROVED OFFSITE 1 WEEK
LOCATION. INSTALL PAVEMENT SUB-BASE PER PLAN. NOTE THAT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE WILL ONLY BE 12' WIDE
UNTIL STEP 14.
13. FINE GRADE DRIVEWAY APRON, WALKS AND CURBS AND INSTALL SUB-BASE, THEN INSTALL THOSE CONCRETE 1 WEEK
IMPROVEMENTS.
14. REMOVE SOUTH-SIDE 141 LF OF SILT FENCE AND WIDEN THE ENTRANCE TO 14' AS SHOWN. REFRESH PAVEMENT 3 DAYS
SUB-BASE AND INSTALL PAVEMENT BASE COURSE. REPLACE EPDM MATERIAL WITH NEW FILTER LOG MATERIAL
RINGED AROUND BOTH INLET GRATES.
15. INSTALL VEGETATED FILTREXX BIOWALL (OR OWNER-APPROVED EQUAL) ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. 2 DAYS
16. INSTALL VOLUNTARY LANDSCAPING AND REQUIRED TREES TO SATISFY CENTREVILLE TREE CANOPY CODE. 1 DAY
17. FINE GRADE REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS AND STABILIZE WITH 3" TOPSOIL AND SOD. (SEED AND MULCH ARE AN 2 DAYS
ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE, BUT SOD IS RECOMMENDED FOR INSTANT ROBUST STABILIZATION, PARTICULARLY
ALONG THE FRONT AND SIDES OF THE PROPERTY.)
18. ONCE ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED, REMOVE INLET PROTECTION AND PAVE TOP COURSE OF ASPHALT. 2 DAYS
19. UPON APPROVAL FROM THE SITE INSPECTOR, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL 1 DAY
DEVICES.
SEE SHEET 7 FOR RELATED DETAILS
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC GRADING &SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 4
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE AS NOTED dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

(cid:54)(cid:50)(cid:44)(cid:47)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:17)(cid:32)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:147)
STORMWATER INFOMATION
LEGEND
DEPTH FROM BOTTOM 1 SAWCUT EX. CURB TO NEAREST JOINT AND POUR NEW 2' RADIUS CURB AND NOSE DOWN
EXISTING PROPOSED STEP NO REQUIREMENT R V E O Q L U U IR M E E D P V R O O L V U ID M E E D NOTES S (I U N R C F H A E C S E ) OF E L LA E Y V E . R SOIL TEXTURE NOTES FLUSH WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALK.
2 SAWCUT EX. ASPHALT AND PAVE PROPOSED CONCRETE APRON FLUSH, 3' RADIUS.
0"-8" 99.3 TOPSOIL -
WATER
1 QUALITY 948 cf 2,862 cf STORMTECH 8"-20" 98.3 SANDY LOAM - 3 SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR PROPOSED WALL-MOUNTED PARKING LOT LIGHTING.
DRY WELL
(ESDv)
4 HANDICAP PARKING SIGN FASTENED TO BUILDING WALL PER DETAIL THIS SHEET.
20"-33" 97.2 SILT LOAM -
RECHARGE STORMTECH 5 9'x9' FENCED TRASH CORRAL. FENCING SHALL BE 5' HIGH WHITE VINYL PER OWNER WITH
2 948 cf 2,862 cf 33"-65" 94.6 SANDY LOAM TRACE OF 3/4" GRAVEL A 4' WIDE LATCHING DOOR. CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE 4" CONCRETE ON 4" CR-6 PER
(Rev) DRY WELL
20 SIDEWALK DETAIL THIS SHEET.
65"-73" 93.9 SILT LOAM -
21
CHANNEL 6 DRYWELL SHALL UTILIZE WOVEN IMPERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE CLOTH ON FOUR SIDES
1.5% 3 PROTECTION 1,747 cf 2,862 cf STORMTECH 73"-105" 91.2 COARSE SILTY SAND 10% OF 3/4" GRAVEL AND TOP. NO GEOTEXTILE ALLOWED ON BOTTOM.
DRY WELL
(Cpv)
105"-116" 90.3 COARSE SAND CLEAN, GRAY SAND
OVERBANK
NOT 116"-141" 88.2 COARSE SAND REDDISH SAND, POCKETS OF
4 FLOOD N/A 4,506 cf
REQUIRED LOAMY SAND BELOW 132"
(Qp)
141"-149" 87.2 MEDIUM SAND CLEAN, GRAY SAND
EXTREME
NOT MOTTLING AT 146"
5 FLOOD N/A N/A
(Qf) REQUIRED 1/11/2024
INFILTRATION RATE: 9.0 in/hr TEST DEPTH: (cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:27)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:27)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:147)
(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:42)(cid:43)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:53)(cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:58)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:32)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:17)(cid:27)(cid:147)
X X
SS S SS
C/O C/O
W W
M M
O.W.
RD
> >
E
E
SOIL BORING LOCATION
AuB HSG C
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LOD
SILT FENCE SF
SUPER SILT FENCE SSF
FILTER LOG FL-8
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMP. STOCKPILE LOCATION
SEE SHEET 8 FOR RELATED DETAILS
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 5
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE AS NOTED dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

UTILITY NOTES
LEGEND 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST PIT EXISTING STUB (LOCATION FROM RETTALACK & SONS
AS-BUILT) AND NOTIFY ENGINEER AND TOWN DPW STAFF. IF STUB IS 6" PVC, THE
EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED WATER METER CAN BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE STUB. IF STUF IS 4"
PVC, NOTIFY THE SPRINKLER DESIGNER TO DETERMINE IF THE PROPOSED WATER PLAN
METER CAN BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE STUB WITH A 4>6 REDUCER. IF THE
STUB IS SMALLER THAN 4", THE STUB SHALL BE CUT BACK AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO
THE CORPORATION STOP OR MAIN AND CAPPED DURING THE WORK TO CONNECT THE
NEW 6" WATER SERVICES.
2. COORDINATE METER VAULT WITH ARCHITECT'S FOUNDATION PLAN. THE TOP OF
20
21 (cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:56)(cid:47)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:54)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:50)(cid:51)(cid:50)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:50)(cid:59)(cid:44)(cid:48)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:60)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:147)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:43)
THE VAULT SITTING ON TOP OF THE FOUNDATION FOOTER. THIS REQUIRES THE
1.5%
FOOTER TO BE STEPPED DOWN TO ACCOMMODATE THE VAULT HEIGHT.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH DRY UTILITY PROVIDERS (ELECTRIC, PHONE,
DATA) TO SERVE THE BUILDING FROM THIS UTILITY POLE. IF CONDUITS ARE
REQUIRED, ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION MAY BE
NECESSARY.
1 inch = 5 ft.
X X
SS S SS
C/O C/O
W W
M M
O.W.
RD
> >
E
E
NOTES:
1. SEE ENGINEER OR TOWN OF CENTREVILLE DEPARTMENT
OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR ADDITIONAL CUT SHEETS AND
SPECIFICATIONS THAT ACCOMPANY THIS DETAIL, WHICH
RELATE TO PIPING, BENDS, VALVES, LID ETC.
2. METER VAULT SHALL BE DELIVERED WITH PAINT
STENCILING TO INDICATE DIRECTION OF FLOW - "IN" AND
"OUT LOCATED ON THE APPROPRIATE VAULT ENDS
3. DETAIL SHALL BE MIRRORED TO SUIT PLAN LAYOUT THIS
SHEET.
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC UTILITY PLAN SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 6
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE 1" = 5' dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

STANDARD SYMBOL STANDARD SYMBOL
SF SF
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. USE WOOD POSTS 13 4 X 13 4(cid:3)(cid:147)(cid:3)1 16 INCH (MINIMUM) SQUARE CUT OF SOUND QUALITY HARDWOOD. AS AN
ALTERNATIVE TO WOODEN POST USE STANDARD "T" OR "U" SECTION STEEL POSTS WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN 1
POUND PER LINEAR FOOT.
2. USE 36 INCH MINIMUM POSTS DRIVEN 16 INCH MINIMUM INTO GROUND NO MORE THAN 6 FEET APART.
3. USE WOVEN SLIT FILM GEOTEXTILE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION H-1 MATERIALS AND FASTEN GEOTEXTILE SECURELY
TO UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES AT TOP AND MID-SECTION.
4. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION TO THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
INSPECTION/ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY SHOWING THAT THE GEOTEXTILE USED MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS IN
SECTION H-1 MATERIALS.
5. EMBED GEOTEXTILE A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES VERTICALLY INTO THE GROUND. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE SOIL
ON BOTH SIDES OF FABRIC.
6. WHERE TWO SECTIONS OF GEOTEXTILE ADJOIN: OVERLAP, TWIST, AND STAPLE TO POST IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THIS DETAIL.
7. EXTEND BOTH ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE A MINIMUM OF FIVE HORIZONTAL FEET UPSLOPE AT
FLOW
45 DEGREES TO THE MAIN FENCE ALIGNMENT TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM GOING AROUND THE ENDS OF THE SILT
FENCE.
8. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS WHEN BULGES DEVELOP IN SILT FENCE OR WHEN SEDIMENT
REACHES 25% OF FENCE HEIGHT. REPLACE GEOTEXTILE IF TORN. IF UNDERMINING OCCURS, REINSTALL FENCE.
CROSS SECTION
POSTS
STEP 1 STEP 2
STAPLE STAPLE
STAPLE STAPLE
STAPLE STAPLE
STEP 3 FINAL
CONFIGURATION
STAPLE STAPLE
1 1
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 7
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE AS NOTED dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

NOTES:
1. CONCRETE: MARYLAND SHA MIX #6 (4500 PSI).
2. REINFORCING: 2 LAYERS 4x4 W4xW4MEETING ASTM 185.
3. PIPE OPENINGS PER SITE REQUIREMENTS.
4. INVERT TO BE INSTALLED IN FIELD BY OTHERS.
5. FRAME AND GRATE PER MD-374.02.
A A
2'-8"
TOP VIEW
AS REQ.
6" WALLS
(typ.)
AS REQ.
6" 5'-6"
SECTION A-A
PRECAST INLET
Modified WR Inlet
DRAWN BY: DWG# :
J.T. 1 of 1
SCALE: Not to Scale DATE: 1-5-04
4'-0 1/4"
3" 3'-6 1/4" 3"
STANDARD WR SINGLE
FRAME & GRATE. FOR
DETAILS SEE STDS.
MD-374.02 & MD-374.03
PLAN
TOP OF PAVEMENT
5 (cid:5)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:38)(cid:43)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:50)(cid:47)(cid:55)(cid:15)
8 1/2" 8 1/2" 8
4 PER FRAME
(FOR DETAILS SEE
STANDARD MD-374.02).
2'- 7 1/4"
REINFORCEMENT: NO.
(cid:23)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:41)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:36)(cid:53)(cid:54)
@6"C/C 2 WAYS 2"
COVER
SECTION A-A
POSITION OF CURB WHEN
REQUIRED- TO BE PAID FOR PER
TOP OF PAVEMENT
LINEAR FEET OF STANDARD CURB.
BRICK OR
CONCRETE
CHANNEL NOTE:
INLET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF
TO SLOPE
REINFORCED CONCRETE (MIX NO.2).
AT LEAST 2"
SIZE, TYPE, AND DIRECTION OF OUTLET PIPE
PER FOOT
WILL VARY TO SUIT EACH CASE AND THE
TOWARD
INVERT WILL BE ALTERED ACCORDINGLY.
OUTLET
BRICK FOR MASONRY, TO COMPLY WITH THE
8 1/2" 8 1/2" LATEST S.H.A. SPECIFICATIONS. IF LADDER
RUNGS ARE REQUIRED SEE STANDARD
SECTION B-B
MD-383.91 OR MD-383.92.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
STANDARDS FOR HIGHWAYS AND INCIDENTAL STRUCTURES
SINGLE WR INLET
STANDARD NO. MD-374.06
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC STORMWATER DETAILS SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 8
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE AS NOTED dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

DETAIL
NOT
USED
PROVIDE 30" COVER UNTIL READY TO INSTALL PAVEMENT SUB-BASE
LOWEST ELEVATION OF CR-6 SUB-BASE ELEV = 98.6
ELEV=97.1
ELEV=96.1
ELEV=91.1
ELEV=90.3
DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER
NOTE SITE-SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS (cid:32)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:10)(cid:3)(cid:147)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:32)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:17)(cid:27)(cid:12)
APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: REVISIONS: DATE: Dumb Home, LLC STORMTECH DETAILS SHEET:
Professional Certification:
DECEMBER 1, 2023
I hereby certify that these 309 Windsor Ave
1/19/2024 ADDRESS TAC COMMENTS, SUBMIT FOR PLAN. COM.
TOWN OF SCALE: documents were Centreville, MD 21617 216 N COMMERCE ST 9
prepared or approved by
TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ENGINEER DATE QA Co. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE AS NOTED dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me, and that I am a duly MIXED-USE BUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensed Professional
MARYLAND APPROVED BY: JOB NUMBER: Engineer under the laws 301-529-2368
3RD ELECTION DISTRICT, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MD
23-013
of the State of Maryland,
License No. 31184, TAX MAP 44C, GRID 8, PARCEL 778 of 9
DESIGNER:
Expiration Date: 1-16-25. DATE: PREPARED FOR: TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
QA Co. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

S D
ITE EVELOPMENT
S M N
TORMWATER ANAGEMENT ARRATIVE
FOR
216 N C S
OMMERCE T
C , MD
ENTREVILLE
PREPARED FOR:
TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC
11 MARCIA LN
DORSET, VT 05251
PREPARED BY:
DUMB HOME, LLC
309 WINDSOR AVE
CENTREVILLE, MD 21617
JANUARY, 2024
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND.
STEVE LAYDEN, LICENSE NO. 31184 DATE:
EXPIRATION DATE: 1/16/2025
JOB #23-011

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I NARRATIVE
a) Project Summary
b) Vicinity Map
c) USDA Soils
II WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS
a) ESD Volume Calculations
b) ESD Practice Worksheet: Bioretention
c) ESD Practice Worksheet: Grass Swale
III CRITICAL AREA 10% RULE CALCULATIONS
IV EXISTING STORM DRAIN CAPACITY
(FOR MATAPEAKE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS)
V ONSITE STORM DRAIN CAPACITY CALCULATIONS
a) Storm Drainage (10-year storm)
b) Roof Drain (100-year storm)
VI HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS OF EXISTING SETTLING POOLS
VII GEOTECHNICAL BORINGS AND INFILTRATION
VIII MAPS
a) ESD Practice Drainage Map
b) Phase 1 Post-Development Drainage Area Map

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NARRATIVE
216 N COMMERCE ST
The project consists of a 32’ x 60’ mixed use building with a rear parking lot to be built on a
8,666 sqft vacant lot at 216 North Commerce Steet in the Central Business District of
Centreville. The lot formerly included a single-family house, which was demolished between
2013 and 2018. Soils consist of Ingleside Sandy Loam, which are categorized as hydrologic
Group A, according to the USDA Web Soil Survey. The majority of the site is turf grass with
gradual slopes draining from right to left when facing the lot (south to north using “plan north”
on the site plans.)
The stormwater system shown in the engineering plans consists of an underground dry well
system using Stormtech® chambers and their robust isolator row for pretreatment and
collection of trash. This is an Environmental Site Design (ESD) microscale practice described
Maryland Stormwater Design Manual under section M-5, Dry Wells. The dry well is intended
to infiltrate runoff rather than discharging it, and the enclosed soil boring log shows that the
soils at the lower portion of the drywell intercept well-drained sand, with more than two feet of
separation to seasonal high groundwater.
The dry well is fed by two roof drains at the rear of the building, an inlet in the rear parking lot,
and an inlet in the driveway near the building’s front entrance. As a result, the vast majority of
proposed impervious areas are captured by the system, with only the front sidewalk and drive
apron draining into North Commerce Street. We have sized the system to accommodate a
drainage area that includes roughly half of the upstream Miles Insurance Agency, which drains
onto the subject property.
As a result of this development, potential runoff flowing to the Lots to the North (Echo 5 and
Hunter Properties), should see a significant reduction in runoff entering their properties from
the subject lot because it will be intercepted and collected in the dry well. Moreover, the
design calls for impermeable fabric to be provided along the top and sides of the system in
order to limit infiltration from the bottom only, and not the sides. With the bottom of the
system located roughly 9’ below grade, the possibility of infiltration increasing basement
flooding on adjacent properties is minimized.
The drywell provides water quality and water quantity management. The required water
quality volume is 948 cubic feet (cf), and the system volume is significantly larger at 2,862 cf, so
the required ESD volume is exceeded by a factor of three.
We have evaluated the system performance in the HydroCAD modeling software for the 2, 10
and 100—year storms and determined the existing and proposed runoff characteristics.
DRAINAGE AREA PEAK RUNOFF RATES
Existing (cfs) Proposed (cfs)
2-Year Storm 0.67 1.00
10-Year Storm 1.40 1.69
100-Year Storm 2.22 2.43

The soils are extremely well-drained below a depth of about six feet when the sandy loam
changes to course sand, with infiltration rates measured from 9 inches per hour to 12. We
conservatively used an infiltration rate of 4 inches per hour in the HydroCAD model, and the
chart below demonstrates the system performance:
DRY WELL PERFORMANCE
Discharge Runoff Volume Ponding Depth
Rate (cfs) Discharged (cf) in Dry Well (ft)
2-Year Storm 0.0 0 2.89
10-Year Storm 0.0 0 5.45
100-Year Storm 0.03/0.56* 675 6.75 (Full)
* 0.03 cfs under normal conditions, 0.56 cfs if infiltration is neglected
Evaluating this information, here are the key takeaways:
• There is no discharge from the drywell in the 2 and 10-year events: all runoff
reaching the drywell is infiltrated.
• In the 100-year event, the system fills up and discharges into North
Commerce via the double inlet at a minimal peak rate of 0.03 cfs
• Even if there were no infiltration from the system (which is unlikely given the
ability of the isolator row to sequester a decade or more of trash and
sediment), the maximum discharge rate from the site would be 0.56 cfs.
• Only 675 cf of runoff is discharged from the site, assuming normal
infiltration, which is roughly 11 percent of the 5,969 cf of runoff entering the
system. 5,294 cf of runoff is infiltrated
• The system drains completely in about 20 hours, assuming normal
infiltration. This means the system will be able to accommodate back-to-
back storms.
• Ponding depth in the drywell (the stone reservoir is 6.75’ deep) is reasonable,
with the system only filling up in roughly a 50-year storm. In a 100-year
storm, the system is full and slowly overflowing for roughly an hour via the
double inlet near North Commerce. The timing of this overflow is delayed
past the peak rainfall, meaning the rush of water in the street will have
probably already passed by the time the system overflows.
CONCLUSION
The proposed dry well is an extremely effective system to provide water quality and water
quantity treatment. The water quality requirement is exceeded, with the ESD volume provided
roughly 3 times that required. Water quantity management is provided for storms up through
the 100-year event, with any runoff exiting the site runs harmlessly into the adjacent street.
Adjacent and downstream properties are adequately protected from negative consequences
from stormwater discharges from the subject property. The Stormtech Isolator Row provides

superior pretreatment to sequester accumulated sediment and trash, which protects the
performed and infiltration capacity of the drywell. The isolator row can be conveniently
maintained by using water jet to push accumulated waste toward the inflow manhole where it
is collected in a vacuum truck. The developer intends for the property to be run by a
management company that will enter into a contract for inspection and maintenance of the
drywell/Stormtech® system.

(cid:54)(cid:50)(cid:44)(cid:47)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:17)(cid:32)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:147)
DEPTHFROM BOTTOM
SURFACE OFLAYER SOILTEXTURE NOTES
(INCHES) ELEV.
0"-8" 99.3 TOPSOIL -
8"-20" 98.3 SANDYLOAM -
20"-33" 97.2 SILTLOAM -
33"-65" 94.6 SANDYLOAM TRACEOF34"GRAVEL
65"-73" 93.9 SILTLOAM -
73"-105" 91.2 COARSESILTYSAND 10OF34"GRAVEL
105"-116" 90.3 COARSESAND CLEAN,GRAYSAND
116"-141" 88.2 COARSESAND REDDISHSAND,POCKETSOF
LOAMYSANDBELOW132"
141"-149" 87.2 MEDIUMSAND CLEAN,GRAYSAND
MOTTLINGAT146"
1112024
INFILTRATIONRATE:9.0inhr TESTDEPTH: (cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:27)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:27)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:147)
(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:42)(cid:43)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:53)(cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:58)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:32)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:17)(cid:27)(cid:147)

LEGEND
EXISTING PROPOSED
20
21
1.5
X X
SS S SS
CO CO
W W
M M
O.W.
RD
E
E
SOILBORINGLOCATION
AuB HSGC
LIMITOFDISTURBANCE LOD
SILTFENCE SF
SUPERSILTFENCE SSF
FILTERLOG FL-8
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE
TEMP.STOCKPILELOCATION
APPROVEDBY: APPROVEDBY: REVISIONS: DATE: DumbHome,LLC DRAINAGEAREAMAP SHEET:
ProfessionalCertification:
DECEMBER1,2023
Iherebycertifythatthese 309WindsorAve
1192024 ADDRESSTACCOMMENTS,SUBMITFORPLAN.COM.
TOWNOF SCALE: documentswere Centreville,MD21617 216NCOMMERCEST 5a
preparedorapprovedby
TOWNOFCENTREVILLEENGINEER DATE QACo. DEPT.OFPUBLICWORKS DATE ASNOTED dumbhome@gmail.com
CENTREVILLE, me,andthatIamaduly MIXED-USEBUILDING
www.dumbhome.com
licensedProfessional
MARYLAND APPROVEDBY: JOBNUMBER: Engineerunderthelaws 301-529-2368
3RDELECTIONDISTRICT,QUEENANNE'SCOUNTY,MD
23-013
oftheStateofMaryland,
LicenseNo.31184, TAXMAP44C,GRID8,PARCEL778 of 9
DESIGNER:
ExpirationDate:1-16-25. DATE: PREPAREDFOR:TREDAVONPARTNERS,LLC
QACo. SOILCONSERVATIONSERVICE DATE SEL COPYRIGHT C 2024

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
The Town of Centreville Technical Advisory Committee met on Monday, December 11, 2023
via Zoom. The following members were in attendance: Carolyn Brinkley, Acting Town
Manager; Stacey Dahlstrom, Town Planner; Sharon VanEmburgh, Town Attorney; Michael
Whitehill, Town Engineer; Betty Jean Hall, Acting Town Clerk; Kip Matthews, Director of
Public Works; and Gary Phillips, Acting Director of Public Works.
The Technical Advisory Committee provided the following comments:
TRED AVON PARTNERS, LLC – SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
PROPOSED MIXED USE – 216 NORTH COMMERCE STREET
CENTREVILLE BUSINESS DISTRICT – MAP 044C – PARCEL 0778
1. Submitted project is a principle permitted use under § 170-22 A-10. The ground floor is
designated for commercial use.
2. Per queries in the Applicant’s cover:
3. This parking calculation should be acceptable on precedence and code, this is in the CBD
and the applicant can also prevail on § 170-22 F inasmuch as the top deck of the State
parking garage is available under agreement with the Town. We should ask the applicant
if he inquired whether the County lot in the rear of the site can be cited for offsite
calculations. It is clear the access road cannot be extended into that lot, but pedestrian
access might.
4. The front yard setback should be acceptable per § 170-22 E (1) as it sits where the prior
structure was (see attached 2004 aerial). Also note that the Miles Insurance building
front sits on the line between the County Health Department building and the proposed
building which is also desirable.

5. The drive access lane does have a sidewalk along it per § 170-22 E (2) however it is not
ADA accessible from Commerce Street as currently designed….It can however be made
to be so by separating the risers into the commercial from a ramped walk to the rear. The
engineer should take a look at that condition. We should note as to the applicant’s
suggestion for a sign on Commerce alerting its traffic to the conflict with traffic exiting
the site, the town has no authority to place signs and the MSHA would have to give
approval. It should be noted that the Miles Insurance drive entry and the entry to the
ECHO 5 lot mirror that proposed by the applicant. [ While presumably beyond the
prevue of the Town review authority, both Miles and Tred Avon’s ingress and egress
issues could be eased by a private shared drive agreement for one-way use. This type of
agreement could also be made with ECHO5 but with less workable width.] The nature of
the commercial tenant is the wild card as a very popular use will exacerbate the potential
congestion.
6. Changing the railing along the walkway to the same as shown on the balconies would
have more consistency in the design of the structure and with the historic district.
7. I do not see any ADA access from the handicapped space in the parking lot to the
sidewalk. There are no doors in the east elevation therefore the south elevation door must
be accessible.
8. Trench repair in Commerce shall be in accordance with MSHA repair standards.
9. 4” meter vault detail including in & out stenciling.
10. 6” sewer laterals are used in Commerce Street.
11. Has the applicant received comments from QAC Stormwater Management?
12. The subject property currently has one water/sewer allocation. A minimum of five
additional allocations will be required to be purchased by the property owner to service
the currently proposed structure. The commercial use may require additional allocations
to be purchased in the future, the Town reserves the option to recalculate based on use.

MEMORANDUM
TO: TOWN OF CENTREVILLE FROM: STACEY DAHLSTROM, AICP
PLANNING COMMISSION SD
SENIOR PLANNER, EPR FOR
CENTREVILLE
ORGANIZATION: CENTREVILLE MD DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2024
Re: 216 N Commerce Street - Mixed Use
Building
 URGENT X FOR YOUR USE  PLEASE COMMENT PLEASE REPLY 
PLEASE RECYCLE
Introduction
The Applicant seeks Site Plan Review (§170-22 A. (10) in accordance with the provisions of §170-
47) for a new three floor 5,260 square feet mixed-use building on a currently vacant lot proposed
to consist of 900 square feet of commercial, one, one bedroom and four two bedroom residential
apartments (updated since the original application which notes ground floor commercial use and
five one-bedroom residential apartments). The site (Map 44C, Parcel 778) is approximately 8,236
square feet (Property Land Area: SDAT) to 8,666 SF (Total Site Area noted on Site and
Construction Plans) in size.
Future Land Use and Zoning: Central Business District (CBD)
The following excerpt (page 36) from the Future Land Use Centreville Comprehensive Plan 2040
Central Business District (CBD) establishes the continued support/consistency for Mixed Use
Residential (ground floor commercial uses) provided in CBD zoning noted below.
“…This designation encompasses properties within downtown where mixed-use
development is encouraged, and a broad array of commercial and institutional land
uses would continue to be allowed. The Plan also encourages residential
apartments above commercial storefronts and new residential buildings with
densities that can meaningfully increase the resident population in the CBD, such
as one housing unit per 1,200 square feet of lot area…”
1

Future Land Use Map
The proposed use (Mixed Use Residential with ground floor retail) is permitted in CBD Zoning,
especially in accordance with the following from §170-22, and §170-22 (A) 10 as well as §170-22
(E) and (F) (relevant excerpts noted here:
“…The zone permits retail and service uses of a limited intensity which serve the needs of the
neighborhood and highway-oriented population. It is also the intent of this zone that new
development and redevelopment be consistent with the existing historic nature of Centreville with
regard to building setbacks, building orientation and lot coverage.”
2

“(A)10. Apartments in multistory buildings, provided that the portion of the ground
floor fronting the street remains commercial, and the property will be subject to site
plan review when converted to such use.”
“E. Except as otherwise noted in the Schedule of Zone Regulations, the following
additional requirements shall apply to the CBD District:
1. Front yard setbacks shall be established by setbacks of existing buildings
located on either side of the lot to be developed. Where no buildings exist
on either side of the lot to be developed, the average setback from the edge
of the street to the building front of all buildings along the street shall be
used to determine the maximum setback of the proposed development.
2. Side yard setbacks can be reduced to zero except where pedestrian access is
provided to parking areas or other uses. Where vehicular access is provided
along the side yard, a four-foot-wide sidewalk shall also be provided along
the vehicular access.
3. The ground floor street frontage of each structure shall be pedestrian-
oriented, and windows shall be provided to the maximum extent practical
rather than blank walls.
F. Parking shall be provided in accordance with Article IV of this chapter. The
Planning and Zoning Commission may consider the use of existing on-street
parking areas and/or other existing public parking areas in meeting the
minimum parking requirements for a proposed use, if the applicant can
demonstrate that said parking spaces and areas will be available at the
appropriate times for the patrons, residents or employees of the proposed use.”
As provided in Section 170-47D, the Planning and Zoning Commission’s role is to review and
approve, conditionally approve, or reject a site plan.
This Application was reviewed by the Town of Centreville Technical Advisory Committee on
Monday December 11, 2023, the minutes are included in your package and the applicant has
provided responses and updated their submittal including responses to those comments.
For your convenience Site Plan Review Checklist – Overview (170-47) is provided at the
conclusion of this memo. In addition to the comments provided below, some additional items for
clarification have been noted in the Checklist that the Planning Commission should consider.
.
3

The location of 106 N Commerce Street is provided in the attached snip from Google Maps to provide an image re the larger context of
the location of the property. The property formerly had a single-family residential structure located on it; context of its former
location/placement is provided on the 2004 aerial (shared by Mike Whitehill from Property View).
Goggle Street View - 2022
4

2004 Property View Aerial
5

Google Aerial View 2024
Comments
Please note some of these items address responses to TAC comments which are referenced as they
are not addressed in numerical order.
1. Placement of building and front setback. The applicant notes per TAC comment 4: That they
worked to strike a balance between the aesthetic constraints of the existing buildings on the
block and the need to provide room for the water meter in the front yard and the minimum
setback from the property lines (regarding construction safety). It’s unfortunate that the water
meter utility box and other applicable site constraints can’t provide placement of the building to
be in closer alignment with the entry steps for the two adjacent properties to the North towards
Turpin’s Lane. The placement of the building does appear to be in alignment with the existing
one story building (noted as EX ONE STORY FRAME DWELLING Sheets 2-5) immediately
to the North.
6

2. Regarding the Applicant’s response to TAC item #6 the railing on the entryway to the proposed
building being updated to provide more consistency with the ones proposed for the balconies as
well as the adjacent historic properties, while it is appreciated that the handrails shown for the
entrance have been updated to match the railings of the balconies, additional consideration to
include the matching balusters is appreciated.
As noted in the Town’s Design Guidelines “If a proposed building is not adjacent to other
buildings having a desirable architectural character, the Planning Commission may require the
application to use contextual elements found elsewhere within the area.”
Please see the railing in place across the street (google street view image below), as it appears to
more closely match the proposed detail provided on the balconies and both buildings have
balusters on the railings (white ones on the white building are in the center helping distinguish
front porch areas for each side). Updating the Handrails on the ground floor entryway to also
include the balusters will provide a more cohesive/consistent design feature, help integrate the
design better with adjacent properties and help unify the commercial and residential aspects of
the mixed use structure.
3.
Google Street view west side of Commerce Street (W and NW of the site)
4. As noted on Sheet one, based on the Parking calculations required in Article IV §170-32 Off-
street Parking, the proposed uses (900 square feet of Commercial, one, one bedroom and four
two bedroom residential apartments) require 14 parking space, and the applicant provides
7

information for the Planning Commission’s consideration for the requested deviation to 9 spaces
(reduction of 5 spaces, approximately 36%).
a. TAC Comment item #3, Regarding the availability of the Parking Deck of the State
Parking Garage being under agreement with the Town. Please note that the Town is
not comfortable committing to any availability of the State Parking Garage parking
deck at this time. Recommend updating the Note on Sheet 1 of 9 regarding
“...OFFSITE SPACES MAY BEING AVAILABLE ON AT THE LIBERTY
STREET RAISED PARKING DECK…”.
b. Noting the applicant has indicated the addition of a wood path in the location of an
existing informal pathway from the proposed lot and the County owned lot on Sheet
3 of the site plan? Has the applicant confirmed that the parking in the lot is available
for shared use with the enhanced (woodchip) pedestrian access and that the County is
supportive of the woodchip improvement of the path? It appears to be a separate lot
from the parking area immediately behind the QAC Health Department (see clip from
QAC property view below). The entire parking area behind the County Health
Department Building shows up as a Public Parking Lot with 127 spots on Google
Maps.
Lot @ 207 Banjo Lane – QAC Property View
8

As noted above, “The Planning and Zoning Commission may consider the use of existing
on-street parking areas and/or other existing public parking areas in meeting the
minimum parking requirements for a proposed use, if the applicant can demonstrate that
said parking spaces and areas will be available at the appropriate times for the patrons,
residents or employees of the proposed use.”
Additionally, 170-32 Provides the ability for the Planning Commission to consider
deviations of up to 50% in parking requirements, this applicant proposes less than a 50%
reduction of on site parking. §170-32, B.2. states
“Therefore, the Town (through the Planning and Zoning
Commission) may permit deviations of up to 50% from the
presumptive requirements of Subsection A above and may
require more or allow less parking as may be deemed appropriate
during the process of site plan review. In determining whether or
not it is appropriate to allow such deviations, the applicant shall
have the burden of supplying evidence that such a change is
warranted. This evidence shall include the applicant's experience
with the same use in other jurisdictions, alternate standards (and
an assessment of their adequacy) for the same use in other
communities, or a suggested standard by a nationally recognized
authority in parking (e.g., the Institute of Transportation
Engineers, the American Planning Association, etc.), and an
explanation of the circumstances that necessitate a variation from
the minimum parking requirements.”
c. There seems to be ample on street parking along Commerce Street as well as on
Liberty Street, as well as the lot on Banjo Lane, if the lot on Banjo Lane can be utilized
and the existing path be enhanced for pedestrian access, especially for the shared
nature of the proposed uses (Residential and Commercial).
d. Based on the current proposed on-site parking layout, the applicant and Planning
Commission may want to consider allowing a further reduction of parking by two
spaces (bringing the reduction to 7 required from 14 would be a 50% reduction) is
recommended for consideration for improved automobile and pedestrian access and
circulation. It is recommended that the applicant consider reworking the spaces along
the eastern most side of the parking facility, especially related to providing pedestrian
access if the footpath can be improved with compacted woodchips as well as potential
reduction of the awkward circulation related to he currently proposed outermost two
9

spaces in the SE and NE corners of the lot (one is straight in the drive aisle, the other
in front of the lot bump out area in the northeast corner.
5. The following comments pertain to the dimensions and location of the access (drive aisle) as well
as the edge of pavement in the rear of most of the site.
a. As noted in the Town of Centreville Zone of Regulations, the rear yard in CBD zoning is
required to be five feet. As depicted on sheet 3 of 9, the edge of pavement and the parking
blocks appear to extend into the rear yard in 4 ¼ of the six spaces currently proposed along
the east side of the parking area (from the SE corner extending toward the lot bump out in
the NE corner).
b. §170-32 C.2.d. Off-Street Parking Provides that Entrances from public or private streets
shall be at least 7 1/2 feet from side lot lines, it is unclear if the entrance shown on this
application is consistent with that requirement.
c. §138-48 B Article IV Specifications and Design Considerations, for Streets, Roads and
Improvements, Off-Street Parking indicates that “No driveway serving a parking facility
shall be closer than five feet to a side property line.” It is unclear how the proposed drive
aisle from Commerce Street entrance to the proposed parking area (Sheet 3 of 9) is
consistent with this requirement.
Additional Consideration
In consultation with the Town Engineer Whitehill and Town Manager/Zoning Administrator
Brinkley, we provide the following for consideration (either in coordination with this application or
to be added to the Planning Commission Work Plan regarding updates/modifications re Zoning and
Subdivision regulations:
The Applicant/ Planning Commission may wish to consider a text amendment eliminating
applicability of the entrance distance criteria from the CBD zone.
Based on a quick overview of study of the CBD, easily over 32 of the existing lots and businesses
in the CBD do not meet these criteria. Strict adherence to the criteria applied in the CBD would
hamper businesses from submitting building permits and site plans when most would be de facto
non-conforming. Travelling through the CBD, vehicle drivers do not distinguish the 7½’ or
property lines, so safety would seem not at issue.
Since there are no Buffer Yards required or applicable in the CBD per §170-42 E. Tables of
Required Buffer Yards when adjacent lands lie in the same district, the need for a planting strip-
even one shared by the adjoining land is moot.
10

Site Plan Review Checklist – Overview (Please see especially items highlighted in light blue:
170-47 Site Plans
D. Procedural items
1. Site plans shall be prepared and certified by an P.E. Seal State of MD – dated Jan 19,
engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land 2024.
surveyor duly registered to practice in the State
of Maryland or equivalent certification.
2. All site plans shall clearly show the information
required by this section.
3. If such plans are prepared in more than one sheet, Index Sheet and applicable adjacent properties
match lines shall clearly indicate where the and owners included.
several sheets join, and an index sheet shall be
required.
4. Every site plan shall show the name and address Owner/Developer: Prepared for Tred Avon
of the owner and developer, the election district, Partners, LLC (consistent with Application),
Election District (3rd), date and total number of
North point, date, scale of the drawing, and the
sheets (1 of 9 etc.) noted on all 9 sheets. North
number of sheets.
arrow and scale (vary) provided on Site Plan,
Existing conditions, Grading/ Sediment/Erosion
Control, Stormwater Management Plan, and
Utility Plan (Sheets 2-6).
At least Five clearly legible copies submitted to Centreville Submitted and accepted for review.
Planning and Zoning Commission
C. Information required to be included in the site plan.
2. An area or vicinity map at a scale of not smaller Vicinity Map scale of one-inch equals 1,000 feet
than one-inch equals 2,000 feet and showing as well as Sheets 2-6 show adjoining roads, and
adjacent properties
such information as the names and numbers of
adjoining roads, streams, bodies of water,
railroads, subdivisions, election districts, or
other landmarks sufficient to clearly identify the
location of the property.
A boundary survey plat of the entire site at a scale not smaller than one inch equals 100 feet
unless otherwise specified by the Planning and Zoning Commission showing the following:
a. Existing topography at two- or five-foot contour Topography provided on Sheet 2 – Existing
intervals. Conditions of 9 @ scale of 1 inch = 10 Feet and
noted in Site Notes 7, referencing Survey in Site
note 6 (Sheet 1 of 9)
b. Slopes in excess of 15% (CA only). Not Applicable (NA)
c. Existing and proposed regraded surface of the land. Sheet 4 of 9 Grading & Sediment & Erosion
Control Plan
11

d. Location of natural features such as streams, None appear to be present, Trees noted on
major ravines, drainage patterns, within the area to Existing Conditions (Sheet 2 of 9) appear
varying in diameter from 10 inch to 24 inch
be disturbed by construction and the location of
aren’t proposed to remain. Site Plan Page 3 of 9,
trees measuring greater than 12 inches in diameter
shows An American Holly 8 feet in height and a
to be retained.
Sweet Bay Magnolia 6 feet in height to be
planted in two rear property locations.
e. Floodplain boundaries (one-hundred-year). Cover sheet Site Notes – The property is NOT in
the one Percent Chance Flood Plain based on
FEMA FIRM Map for QAC (Panel No
24035C0212D, 11/05/2014.
f. Location and areal extent of all soils with septic NA
limitations; wet soils; hydric soils; and soils with
hydric properties as shown on the County Soil
Survey (CA only).
3. A detailed drawing showing:
a. Location, proposed use, and height of all buildings Location and proposed uses shown on Sheets 3-
(delineate all existing buildings and structures); 5; Height provided on Jan 18, 2024, Schematic
Design (Torchio). Height shown of 33 Feet, 11
¾ inches and 3 stories (CBD Zone Maxim
Height Regulation is 35 Feet, 3 Stories).
b. Location of all parking and loading areas with Site Plan (Sheet 3 of 9)
ingress and egress drives thereto;
c. Location of outdoor storage (if any); Fenced Trash Corral noted on Site Plan (Sheet 3
of 9)
d. Location and type of recreational facilities (if any); None identified, appears that bump out in rear
NE portion of lot where an 8 foot American
Holly is intended to be planted will be green
space.
e. Location of all existing or proposed site Sheets 3 – 9, all of scale at least and sometimes
improvements, including storm drains, culverts, larger than one inch equals 100 feet.
retaining walls, fences, stormwater management
facilities as well as any sediment and erosion
Shore erosion info is NA for this property.
control structures (information on shore erosion
shall include the existing shoreline management
designation as shown on the Town of Centreville
Critical Area Program Map, existing structures,
their condition, and areas for proposed structural
and nonstructural controls, shown on the boundary
survey plat, at a scale of at least one inch equals 100
feet);
f Description, method, and location of water supply Existing and proposed Water and Sewer
and sewerage disposal facilities; facilities are provided on Existing Conditions
and Site Plan (Sheets 2 and 3 of 9)
g Location, size, and type of all signs; See Site Plan Sheet 3 of 9 No Parking Sign
Detail provided, noted to be installed along
building wall (assume along the entrance to
12

parking area – we should clarify locations?
Additionally, Site note 4 indicates the Handicap
Parking sign, also to be fastened to the building
wall, says per detail on this sheet (assume that
means same notes as the same 3 notes provided
for No Parking Sign Detail?
h The location, size, and type of vehicular entrances Site Plan – sheet 3 of 9, fourteen feet
to the site; predominately one way drive aisle. Applicant
notes in cover letter that exiting cars would have
the right of way, suggest signage be considered
to note that.
i The location of the Critical Area District boundary,
the Buffer and other Buffer areas, open space areas,
and forested areas;
j The location of all Habitat Protection Areas (CA NA
only);
k. The location of all contiguous forested areas NA
adjacent to the site that are linked to forested areas
on the development site, i.e., hedgerows, forest
patches or other wildlife corridors (CA only);
L The location of agricultural fields, barren lands, NA
pasture, etc.
M The location of tidal and nontidal wetlands on the NA – noted in notes that there appear to be
site; no non-tidal wetlands on the property
N The location of existing water-dependent facilities NA
on and adjacent to the site, including the number of
existing slips and moorings on the site (CA only);
O The location and extent of existing and/or proposed Sheet 4 of 9 – Grading & Sediment &
erosion abatement approaches; Erosion Control Plan
P The location of anadromous fish spawning NA
stream(s) on or adjacent to the site and a delineation
of the watershed area of the stream on the site (CA
only); and
q A detailed drawing locating shore erosion NA
abatement techniques to the included with the site
plan (CA only).
r Elevations, which indicate the exterior appearance 216 North Commerce Street Mixed Use
and materials to be used in each structure within the Building Schematic Desing dated Jan 18,
site plan. [Added 4-5-2007 by Ord. No. 1-07] 2024, by Torchio Architects. Please see
note re follow up to TAC response to
Comment #6 above.
4. Computations of:
a Total lot area; As noted above approximately 8,236
Square Feet (Property Land Area: SDAT)
13

to 8,666 SF (Total Site Area noted on Site
and Construction Plans) in size.
b Building floor area for each type of proposed use; 900 Square feet for Commercial use
ground floor, with approximately 4,860
square feet of residential.
c Building coverage in percentage; Percentage Building Coverage doesn’t
appear to be included; applicant likely has
it as a part of impervious coverage
calculation. Note also – no standard for
percent building coverage exists in the
Schedule of Zone Regulations, but the
proposed project’s impervious coverage
ratio (building and parking and paved
areas is within the required 85% (83.5%)
limit in the CBD Zone.
Applicant should confirm that its
approximately 22-23% (5,760 square feet
÷ by 3 (# of floors) = 1,920 Square Feet;
1,920 ÷ by 2,666 or 2, 236 acres.
d Road area; Similar to building coverage above,
Applicant likely has the access driveway
information (from Commerce Street to
Parking area) as part of the base
calculations for impervious coverage ratio
(building and parking and paved areas is
within the required 85% (83.5%) limit in
the CBD Zone.
e Number and area of off-street parking and loading 9 including one Handicapped – please see
spaces; note above for recommended further
considerations.
f Total site area in the Critical Area District (CA NA
only);
g Total man-caused impervious surfaces areas and 471 SF to be removed; 7, 149 SF to be
the percentage of site these occupy; added resulting in 83.5% (noted in Site
Statistics on Sheet 1 of 9).
h Separate computations of the total acres of existing NA
forest cover in the Buffer and in the Critical Area
(CA only);
i Proposed agricultural open space areas; NA
j Proposed forest open space areas; and NA
14

k Total area of the site that will be temporarily NA
disturbed during development and the total area
that will be permanently disturbed. "Disturbed" is
defined as any activity occurring on an area which
may result in the permanent loss of or damage to
existing natural vegetation (CA only).
5. Commercial or industrial uses must include:
a. Specific uses proposed; Applicant has only indicated Commercial
of the nature that requires 3 parking spaces
(1 per 300 SF).
b. Maximum number of employees for which
buildings are designed;
c. Type of energy to be used for any manufacturing NA
processes;
d. Type of wastes or by-products to be produced by NA
any manufacturing process;
e. Proposed method of disposal of such wastes or by- NA
products; and
f. Location of outdoor lighting facilities.
6. In addition to the information above, site plans shall be accompanied by the following:
a. A Forest Management Plan including the NA
comments of the Bay Watershed Forester (CA
only);
b. A Habitat Protection Plan including the comments NA
of the Maryland Forest, Park and Wildlife Service
(CA only);
c. An executed cooperator's agreement with the Soil NA
Conservation District or Farm Plan, as applicable
(CA only);
d. A Stormwater Management Plan; Included as Stormwater Management
Narrative January 2024 and pages 3-4 &
8-9
e. A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan;
f A Planting Plan, as required; and As noted above, Site Plan sheet 3 of 9
identifies both an 8 foot Holly and a 6
foot Sweet Bay Magnolia to be planted.
Item D on page 2 of the Tred Avon
Partners – 216 N Commerce Street Jan 19,
2024 Letter to the Planning Commission
notes that The applicant envisions
providing some small shrubs along the
building to screen the foundation and it is
15

likely that he HVAC will also be placed
within that Strip of Landscaping as well.
g An Environmental Assessment Report which provides a coherent statement of how the
proposed development addresses the goals and objectives of the Centreville Critical Area
Program (CA only). At a minimum the environmental assessment shall include:
(1) A statement of existing conditions, e.g., the NA
amount and types of forest cover, the amount and
type of wetlands, a discussion of existing
agricultural activities on the site, the soil types, the
topography, etc.;
(2) A discussion of the proposed development NA
project, including number and type of residential
units, amount of impervious surfaces, proposed
sewer treatment and water supply, acreage devoted
to development, proposed open space and habitat
protection areas;
(3) A discussion of the proposed development's NA
impacts on water quality and Habitat Protection
Areas; and
(4) Documentation of all correspondence and NA
findings.
7. Other information as requested by the Town. TAC Review Responses included, and a
few additional Comments noted above.
§170-22, and §170-22 (A) 10 as well as §170-22 (E) and
(F) as well as TAC Review items.
16

ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS
October 1 - 31, 2023
Permit # Applicant Owner Address Type Issue Date*
BP-204-23 James Blandford James Blandford 125 East Brook Dr. shed 10/3/2023
BP-205-23 Economy Restoration LLC Joseph Candella 830 Harmony Way replace roof 10/3/2023
BP-206-23 Economy Restoration LLC James Cotter 166 Symphony Way replace roof 10/3/2023
BP-207-23 Economy Restoration LLC Judith Scully 149 Sonata Way replace roof 10/3/2023
BP-208-23 Economy Restoration LLC John Teagle 143 East Meadow Dr. replace roof 10/3/2023
BP-209-23 Economy Restoration LLC Megan Ford 123 Granard Ave. replace roof 10/3/2023
BP-210-23 Sunrun Robert Hays 300 Elm St roof mounted solar panels 10/3/2023
BP-212-23 Andrew Harper Cameron Glaws 620 Chesterfield Ave. remove existing deck & replace 10/11/2023
BP-213-23 Economy Restoration LLC Donald Rizzo 336 Overture Way replace roof 10/11/2023
BP-214-23 Economy Restoration LLC Emory Anderson 135 Harmony Way replace roof 10/11/2023
BP-215-23 Economy Restoration LLC Eric Johnson 502 Little Kidwell replace roof 10/11/2023
BP-216-23 Economy Restoration LLC Lois Labs 814 Harmony Way replace roof 10/18/2023
BP-217-23 Nova Solar Inc. Matthew & Rebecca Perry 144 Cypress St. roof mounted solar panels 10/18/2023
BP-218-23 Power Factor Jacob Trently 119 Banbridge Ave roof mounted solar panels 10/18/2023
BP-219-23 Economy Restoration LLC Katherine Stursa 371 Overture Way replace roof 10/26/2023
BP-220-23 EP Cronshaw 112 W Water, LLC 112 W Water St. interior demolition 10/26/2023
BP-221-23 Amy Lewis, Sunrun Kenneth Bloodsworth 213 Oak St. solar panels 10/23/2026
* based on the approval date by Zoning Administrator

ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS
November 1 - 30, 2023
Permit # Applicant Owner Address Type Issue Date*
BP-222-23 LBS Contracting, LLC Our Mother of Sorrows 301 Homewood Ave. replace roof 11/1/2023
BP-223-23 Jeremy Lins/Lins Construction Harold Haney 143 Meadow Brook Way replace roof 11/1/2023
Byron Hernandez/Home
BP-224-23 Improvement Automation Maria & Dolores Benitez 329 N. Liberty interior renovation 11/8/2023
BP-225-23 Richard Starkey Richard Starkey 359 Kidwell Ave. pole buiding 11/8/2023
BP-226-23 Ray Lewis 226 Broad St./Crumpton LLC. 126 Kidwell Ave. complete interior renovation 11/15/2023
BP-227-23 Venture Solar Kristin Donahue 158 Long CreekWay roof mounted solar panels 11/8/2023
BP-228-23 Trent Hartman Trent Hartman 314 Brooke Run Lane shed 11/15/2023
BP-229-23 Economy Restoration LLC John Locke 806 Harmony Way replace roof 11/15/2023
BP-230-23 Muzon General Contractor LLC Margaret Kolack 415 Opera Court shingle replacement 11/15/2023
BP-231-23 Economy Restoration LLC Irvin Kohne 810 Harmony Way replace roof 11/15/2023
BP-233-23 Economy Restoration LLC Matthew Johnson 201 Elm St. replace roof 11/17/2023
BP-234-23 Christopher Harrison Christopher Harrison 204 Windsor Ave fence 11/17/2023
* based on the approval date by Zoning Administrator

ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS
December 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023
Permit # Applicant Owner Address Type Issue Date*
BP-232-23 CES Equipment & Sales Penn Statiion Joint Ventures 420 Pennsylvania Ave. Commercial/interior reno 12/11/2023
BP-235-23 Monoz Geral Contractor Jeanette Paiter 165 Symphony Way replace roof 12/11/2023
BP-236-23 Elizabeth Baer Elizabeth Baer 103 Tilghman Ave shed 12/11/2023
BP-237-23 Wells Home Improvements Bernard Patterson 304 E Water Street replace roof 12/21/2023
BP-238-23 C & O Services Inc. Erica Stuart 310 Little Kidwell Ave. interior renovation & fence 12/29/2023
BP-239-23 Shore Roofing Solutions William Leavy 169 Orchestra Place replace roof 12/29/2023
BP-240-23 Dana & Lunneth Brazerol Dana & Lunneth Brazerol 207 Lurgan Lane fence 12/29/2023
BP-241-23 Economy Restoration LLC Ann Sharp 170 Symphony Way replace roof 12/29/2023
* based on the approval date by Zoning Administrator
https://centrevillemd.sharepoint.com/sites/WorkingFiles/Shared Documents/General/0-BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS/PLANNING COMMISSION/PC
PACKET INFORMATION/Issued BP Reports/2023 Permits Issued - Copy

ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS
January 1 - 31, 2024
Permit # Applicant Owner Address Type Issue Date*
BP-01-24 Christy Stuart Christy Stuart 203 Kidwell Ave. fence 1/8/2024
BP-02-24 DriGuy Dale Walls 105 Heritage Way add deck 1/8/2024
BP-03-24 Andrew Harper William Stewart 502 Chesterfield Ave. enclose deck 1/25/2024
BP-04-24 Weese Development Island Alliance Church 123 Coursevall Dr. commercial renovation 1/25/2024
BP-05-24 Christian Bryant Christian Bryant 124 Price Street Deck 1/26/2024
* based on the approval date by Zoning Administrator