2026-05-05-Town's-Response-PSC
Document May 5, 2026 · 4 page(s)
Read as text View original PDF ↗
This is a May 6, 2026 letter from Centreville Town Manager Carolyn M. Brinkley to the Maryland Public Service Commission (Case No. 9868) supporting Queen Anne’s County’s comments on three proposed community solar projects (TPE MD QA15A, QA15B, QA15C). The Town says the three separate applications appear to function as one co-located ground-mounted solar station totaling about 9.98 MW AC on a property inside Queen Anne’s County and Centreville Tier II Growth Areas. Centreville notes Tier II areas are planned for future sewer and municipal growth and objects to splitting a single large project into multiple LLC filings to avoid review and siting standards that apply to facilities over 5 MW in Tier I/II areas. The Town requests the PSC evaluate the proposal based on its collective siting, scale, function, and impact on the Town’s Tier II Growth Area and to give substantial weight to the County’s comments; the letter also references attached comprehensive-plan maps.
Show the raw extracted text
Exactly as extracted, unformatted — for checking against the original. The readable version is easier to read.
THE TOWN OF CENTREVILLE 101 LAWYERS ROW CENTREVILLE, MD 21617 410-758-1180 FAX 410-758-4741 WWW.TOWNOFCENTREVILLE.ORG May 6, 2026 Via e-file only Andrew S. Johnston, Executive Secretary Maryland Public Service Commission William Donald Schaefer Tower 6 St. Paul Street, 16th Floor Baltimore, Maryland 21202 RE: Case No 9868 – TPE MD QA15A, LLC/ TPE MD QA15B, LLC/ TPE MD QA15C, LLC Town Council of Centreville Comments On behalf of the Town of Centreville, I am writing in support of the comments submitted by the Queen Anne’s County Department of Planning and Zoning regarding Case No. 9868, involving the proposed TPE MD QA15A, TPE MD QA15B, and TPE MD QA15C community solar generating facilities. The Town shares the County’s concern that the proposal, while submitted as three separate community solar facilities, appears in practical effect to function as one co-located ground- mounted solar energy generating station totaling approximately 9.98 megawatts alternating current. The project materials identify three proposed solar facilities on the same overall site, and the County’s comments note that the facilities are co-located on a single property within the Queen Anne’s County Growth Area and the Town of Centreville’s Tier 2 Growth Area (attached please find QAC 2022 Comprehensive Plan Map 4-11: Growth Areas and Centreville 2025 Comprehensive Plan Map 1B: Growth Tier Designations respectively). This location is significant to the Town. Centreville’s adopted Comprehensive Plan identifies Tier II areas as future growth areas planned for sewer service. These areas are not merely residual rural lands; they are part of the Town’s long-range municipal growth framework. The Town has planned for these areas to accommodate future growth in an orderly manner, consistent with municipal infrastructure planning, interjurisdictional coordination, and the State’s broader policy of directing growth toward existing and planned population centers. The Town is not opposed to renewable energy, and Centreville recognizes the importance of solar energy as part of Maryland’s energy future. However, the Town is concerned when a project that appears to operate as a single, large-scale facility is divided into separate limited liability company applications in a manner that avoids the statutory and local review consequences that would otherwise apply to a facility exceeding 5 megawatts within a Tier I or Tier II mapped growth area. The Town supports the County’s position that the proposal is inconsistent with the spirit and intent of the applicable state and local siting standards. Those standards are intended to protect locally designated growth areas from being consumed by large-scale solar facilities in a manner that may conflict with adopted comprehensive plans, planned infrastructure investments, and future municipal growth. Allowing a single co-located project to avoid those standards solely by dividing the facility among multiple project entities would undermine the purpose of the growth-area protection established by state and local law. For these reasons, the Town of Centreville respectfully requests that the Public Service Commission give substantial weight to the County’s comments and evaluate the proposal based on its collective siting, scale, function, and impact on the Town’s Tier II Growth Area, rather than only on the individual generating capacity of each separately named project entity. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Sincerely, Carolyn M. Brinkley Town Manager Cc via email: Amy Moredock, Director, QAC Planning & Zoning amoredock@qac.org Attachments YALCRAB 5.0 52.0 521.0 0 seliM dxm.saerA htworG nwoT-ytnuoC 11-4\gnippaM\_SIG_\gninnalP\1000.210022\JORP\:M 11-4 PAM LLIH HCRUHC ELLIVERTNEC :paM nalP evisneherpmoC saerA htworG ytnuoC s'ennA neeuQ seitnuoC snwoT detaroprocnI saerA htworG seidoB retaW liaR sdaoR rojaM setatsretnI syawhgiH SU setuoR etatS esU dnaL erutuF deliateD laitnediseR ytisneD woL laitnediseR ytisneD muideM esU dexiM & laicremmoC kraP ssenisuB/lairtsudnI lanoitutitsnI ELLIVELPMET ELLIVSRELDUS NWOTSNEEUQ laruR ytisneD woL yreV tseroF ecapS nepO & erutlucirgA eht rof esU dnaL erutuF deliateD ,ellivnosarG ,ellivsnevetS/retsehC saerA htworG sworraN tneK dna .3-11 paM no nwohs si a deifitnedi ton sah ennA neeuQ htworG s'notgnilliM .aerA htworG .ytnuoC tneK ni si aerA ecruoS esU dnaL laruR ytnuoC s'ennA neeuQ sesoprup gninnalp rof pam siht detaerc yremogtnoM ecallaW lagel a ron yevrus a rehtien si tI .secruos fo yteirav a morf eb dluohs seicnega rehto yb dedivorp noitamrofnI .tnemucod .etairporppa erehw meht htiw deifirev 2202 yaM 53-4 egaP Growth(cid:3)Area(cid:3)6(cid:3)just(cid:3)west(cid:3)of(cid:3)Millstream(cid:3)has(cid:3)been(cid:3)enlarged(cid:3)based(cid:3)on(cid:3)the(cid:3)following(cid:3)poten(cid:415)al(cid:3)characteris(cid:415)cs.(cid:3)(cid:3) As(cid:3)iden(cid:415)fied(cid:3)on(cid:3)Map(cid:3)1(cid:3)natural(cid:3)resource(cid:3)issues(cid:3)around(cid:3)Millstream(cid:3)could(cid:3)serve(cid:3)to(cid:3)help(cid:3)preserve(cid:3)this(cid:3) important asset. This area is currently under single ownership and consists of approximately 241 acres, including a historic resource - the 1881 Home know as Claude Anthony Farm on the Maryland Inventory of(cid:3)Historic(cid:3)Proper(cid:415)es(cid:3)MIHP(cid:3)QA-249. The home is located closer to Hibernia Road and should be appropriately(cid:3)considered(cid:3)regarding(cid:3)historic(cid:3)context(cid:3)and(cid:3)preserva(cid:415)on(cid:3)in(cid:3)any(cid:3)future(cid:3)growth(cid:3)considera(cid:415)ons. • The old railroad bed of the Love Point to Centreville Railroad (one of two competing railroads terminating in Centreville). This feature is both historic and practical as a connection to the existing Millstream Trail system. • Queen Anne’s County can look at the old railroad bed as a possible link from Queenstown to Centreville. • This area and the current GA#6 can most easily be sewered by a direct connection to the wastewater plant headworks via an existing easement in Glendale and over the Bd. of Ed. This means the whole area (including #8) can bypass the south pumping station completely. Growth Areas #4 and #5 head to the South Pumping station as will infill in the Centreville Business Park and infill area #2. • Centreville has complete control of the environmental development concerns for the Millstream. • The Trail system can wrap west of town and connect to the Millstream Trail and Wharf Park. • West bound traffic from #6 and this area will not contribute to the downtown congestion coming and going to work north and south, etc. Map(cid:3)1B(cid:3)iden(cid:415)fies(cid:3)the(cid:3)(cid:415)er(cid:3)designa(cid:415)ons(cid:3)required(cid:3)under(cid:3)the(cid:3)Sustainable(cid:3)Growth(cid:3)&(cid:3)Agricultural(cid:3) Preserva(cid:415)on(cid:3)Act(cid:3)of(cid:3)2012.(cid:3)(cid:3)The(cid:3)designa(cid:415)ons(cid:3)include(cid:3)Tier(cid:3)I(cid:3)designa(cid:415)ons:(cid:3)areas(cid:3)currently(cid:3)served(cid:3)with(cid:3)public(cid:3) sewer; Tier II areas: future growth areas planned for sewer service, and Tier IVA areas (Greenbelt) planned(cid:3)for(cid:3)conserva(cid:415)on(cid:3)and(cid:3)no(cid:3)major(cid:3)subdivisions(cid:3)on(cid:3)sep(cid:415)c. Map 1B - Growth Tier Designations Map 1B Amended 05-15-25 Resolution 05-2025 27