august 21 planning commission packet

Exactly as extracted, unformatted — for checking against the original. The readable version is easier to read.

CENTREVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
August 21, 2024
Liberty Building - 2nd Floor
107 North Liberty Street
7:00 p.m.
A G E N D A
I. CALL TO ORDER – Tim Zuella – Vice Chair
II. Chair’s Announcements
III. Review of Minutes from Previous Meetings
a. May 1, 2024 work session minutes
b. May 15, 2024 meeting minutes
c. June 5, 2024 work session minutes
d. June 26, 2024 meeting minutes
IV. Opening Statement
V. Citizen Comment (Citizens are requested to keep their comments to three minutes)
VI. Appearances
a. Variance Request for Driveway/Walkway in the Critical Area Buffer – 110 Watson Rd,
Darryl Savage, Owner
b. Concept Subdivision and Site Plan for proposed commercial development on proposed
Lots N, O and P, Centreville Business Park, Coursevall, LLC, Owner; Kevin J. Shearon,
P.E., LEED AP, DMS & Associates, LLC
c. Amended Final Site Plan – Outdoor pool and support building, YMCA 210 Vincit Street;
Kevin J. Shearon, P.E., LEED AP, DMS & Associates, LLC
VII. New Business
a. Ordinance 08-2024 – Temporary Moratorium – for review and recommendation to
Council
b. Ordinance 09-2024 – Cannabis Provisions – for review and recommendation to Council
VIII. Old Business
IX. Zoning Issues – Discussion
X. Miscellaneous Business / Correspondence
a. Approved Building Permit lists issued June and July 2024
XI. Citizen Comment (Citizens are requested to keep their comments to three minutes)
XII. Council Member Report
XIII. Adjournment

1
0
'
S
ID
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
DOWN
25' FRONT SETBACK
KCABTES
EDIS
'21
=
'01-
'22
30'
REAR
SETBACK
PROPOSED
COBBLESTONE DRIVE
005.01
NOTE: BUFFER TO
EDGE OF MARSH
EXTENDS OUTSIDE
OF SHEET.
SEE SHEET BMP-4

GENERAL NOTES
1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS TO COMPLY WITH THE BUFFER MITIGATION
AND ESTABLISHMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DRIVEWAY, WALKS, REBUILDING
A DECK, AND A RETAINING WALL. THE EXISTING DWELLING IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BUFFER ON A
129.82' GRANDFATHERED LOT.
S
43˚36'57" E
2. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY CRITICAL
AREA.
3. PART OF THE SITE IS DESIGNATED RCA. PART OF THE SITE IS DESIGNATED IDA.
4. FOR CURRENT DEED REFERENCE SEE LIBER 04276, FOLIO 0033
5. FOR PLAT REFERENCE SEE PLAT BOOK 0000, FOLIO 0000
6. ACCESS TO PROPERTY IS ON WATSON RD. OFF CHESTERFIELD AVE.
7. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF REVIEW OF AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE
SEQUENCE OF IMPLEMENTATION
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE PRE-PLANTING MEETINGS WITH COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING
201.52' DEPARTMENT STAFF. AT LEAST 5 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF DISTURBANCES OF ANY LAND ON SITE.
2. REMOVE \ ELIMINATE TURF GRASS AND TILL AREAS TO BE PLANTED TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES
3. USE TREE SHELTER TUBES WITH MESH TOPS FOR SEEDLINGS PLANTING TO REDUCE ANIMAL
DAMAGE.
CORSICA RIVER 4. MULCH AROUND LANDSCAPING STOCK TO REDUCE COMPETITION FROM INVASIVE SPECIES.
4. MONITOR THE PLANTINGS OFTEN TO REDUCE PLANT STRESS SUCH AS WATER DEFICIENCY,
NUTRIENT DEFICIENCY, INVASIVE SPECIES COMPETITION, PEST DAMAGE, AND DISEASE.
5. THE CONTRACTOR TO OBSERVE MINIMAL SITE PREPARATION/DISTURBANCE, PROTECTION OF
PLANTS AFTER DELIVERY UNTIL THEY ARE PLANTED, PROPER DIGGING AND HANDLING OF PLANT
MATERIALS, PROPER EXCAVATION OF PLANTING AREAS, PLANTING OPERATIONS, STABILIZATION OF
115.76'
N
32˚53'33"
E
T
B
H
U
E
F F
P
E
L
R
A N
P
T
R
I
O
N
T
G
E
A
C
R
T
E
IO
A
N
S
S
W
IG
IT
N
H
A
M
G
U
E
L
.
CH AFTER PLANTING, STAKING AND PRUNING, AND INSTALLATION OF
M
(F
E
IE
A
L
N
D
H
D
IG
EL
H
I N
W
E
A
A
T
T
E
E
R
D
L
)
INE 273.32' M
(F
E
IE
A
L
N
D
H
D
IG
EL
H
I N
W
E
A
A
T
T
E
E
R
D
L
)
INE MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. MONITOR THE PLANTINGS OFTEN TO REDUCE PLANT STRESS SUCH AS WATER DEFICIENCY,
NUTRIENT DEFICIENCY, INVASIVE SPECIES COMPETITION, PEST DAMAGE, AND DISEASE.
2. WATER ONLY AS NECESSARY BUT AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 10 DAYS WITHOUT RAINFALL FROM MAY
THROUGH SEPTEMBER, DEPENDING ON SOIL MOISTURE LEVELS. MONITOR TO ENSURE THAT
OVER-WATERING DOES NOT FREQUENTLY OCCUR.
3. USE LOW NITROGEN AND SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZERS AND APPLY IN LATE FALL OR EARLY SPRING.
4. AT THE END OF THE 2-YEAR MONITORING PERIOD, THE SURVIVAL OF THE PLANTINGS SHALL BE
ASSESSED TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR REPLACEMENT PLANTINGS
REQUIRED SURVIVAL
AT THE END OF THE 2-YEAR MONITORING PERIOD FOR PLANTED LANDSCAPE STOCK, ALL OF THE PLANTS
APROXIMATE LINE ARE REQUIRED TO SURVIVE PER COMAR 27.01.09.01-2J. ANY LANDSCAPE STOCK PLANT OR PLANTS THAT DID
OF TOWN LIMITS NOT SURVIVE SHALL BE REPLACED.
IF THE COUNTY DETERMINES THAT SURVIVAL IS NOT ADEQUATE, THE MONITORING PERIOD MAY BE
EXTENDED AND ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE COUN
BUFFER MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION STANDARDS
71.80'
1. REMOVAL OF NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE 100-FOOT BUFFER AND EXPANDED BUFFER IS
PROHIBITED. CUTTING AND CLEARING OF NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE BUFFER AND EXPANDED
BUFFER SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THIS BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN AS SUBMITTED AND OR AS
FLOODPLAIN
SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
ZONE LINE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED BY CONTACTING THE PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE AT
N
61˚27'03"
E
2.
1
T
E
1
H
X
0
E
I S
V
1
T
IN
0
IN
0
C
G
-
I
F
T
O
A
S
N
O
T
D
T
R
P
B
E
L
U
E
A
F
T
N
,
F
S
T
E
U
E
R
D
I T
O
E
V
N
E
1
T
G
0
H
4
E
I
,
T
S
C
A
L
E
T
O
N
IO
T
T
N
R
S
E
W
H
V
A
IT
I
L
L
H
L
L
I
E
B
N
,
E
T
M
P
H
D
L
E
A
2
B
1
N
U
6
T
1
F
E
7
F
D
E
I
R
N
S
A
H
C
A
C
L
O
L
R
B
D
E
A
M
N
A
C
I
E
N T
W
A
I
I
T
N
H
E
T
D
H
A
IS
N D
P L
S
A
U
N
R
.
V
A
I
L
V
L
A L OF
PLANTED AND NATURALLY REGENERATED AREAS OF THE BUFFER SHALL BE AS DESCRIBED IN THIS
308.94'
RCA
PLAN.
3. NEW LAWN AREAS SHALL NOT BE CREATED WITHIN THE BUFFER AND EXPANDED BUFFER UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THIS BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN.
0 MEDGE OF MARSH
IDA M INSPECTION AGREEMENT
2
M 1, DARRYL SAVAGE, THE OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, SHOWN HEREON, DO HEREBY GRANT
4 PERMISSION TO THE APPROVING AUTHORITY TO INSPECT THE PLANTINGS AT APPROPRIATE TIMES
M M 6 AT THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BELOW.
M
M 8 STREET ADDRESS: 110 WATSON RD. CENTERVILLE, MD 21617
APROXIMATE LINE
193.18'
M
M
M S 56˚05'13"
W 148.50'
1
1
0
2
14 16
18 REBUILD DECK
T
P
A
A
X
R C
M
E
A
L
P
#
: 3
1
5
2
H
95
OF TOWN LIMITS
RCA
20 ______________________________________________________________________________3/5/2024________
M M 16" Sycamore Maple 22 RAIN GARDEN A OWNER DATE M
M 0
EDGE OF MARSH M M IDA M 5 + + + + + * + * + + + * * * * * * * + * + + * + + * + + + + + + + + + DECK 22' 24 + B T T H H U I E S F L M F O I C E N A O R L R C M B R U A IT F N I F C E A A R L G M A E R A E N M A A E G P E R N M O T E G N P R T A L M P A L A N A N N D A H T P A H S P E B R P E O R E O N V V A R IS E L I V O I N E S W O ED F A C N O D M A A P R P 2 R 7 O .0 V 1 E .0 D 9 . F 01 O - R 1 - C 7 ONSISTENCY WITH
FLOODPLAIN M + 12" Black Cherry + 2 1
ZONE LINE 24" 1 M 1 a .6 p " l e Stump + + 14" Paper M + ulberry + + + 10 + 3 26" Locust 6 LAWN DOWN DOWN
5 10 N 19˚05'1 2 3" E 4 6 57.7 8 4 + 10 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + FRAME + 1 1 7 1 .9 " " P S a t p u e m r p Mulber + + ry + + 24" + L 2 o 0 cus + t + + + + + + + + + + + PLANT BED 26" Cherry 2" Dogwood 2 D W ST E O L R LI Y N G
+ + GRAVEL SHED GRAVEL 4" Holly
15 + PARKING PARKING + 8" Holly 9" Cedar EM 20 + + + + + 13" Norway Maple x X 22.2272.2 11 7 .5" Crape Myrtle
WM
N 27˚54'47" 231.01' 12" Crape Myrtle 16" Crape Myrtle M WV
WATSON ROAD B REMOVE 8" HOLLY
S
S
PROPOSED COBBLESTONE
REMOVE PARKING LEGEND LANDSCAPE LEGEND
DRIVEWAY
REPLACE WITH
GARDEN
REMOVE FOREST EDGE CANOPY TREE
13" NORWAY MAPLE 2" CAL. 8' HT. +
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN
24" Maple
CANOPY TREE
1" CAL. 6' HT.
EXISTING TREE REMOVED
14" Stump
Darryl Savage
MEAN HIGH WATER UNDERSTORY TREE
+
SITE PLAN 1" CAL. 6' HT. 110 Watson Road
BUFFER Centerville, Maryland 21617
SCALE 1" = 30' LARGE SHRUB
M EDGE OF MARSH 1 GAL. 4' HT. +
BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FLOODPLAN ZONE
SMALL SHRUB
+
1 GAL. 18" HT. AS NOTED EB
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
6.10.2024
Revised: 7.30.24
PROPERTY LINE
Revised: 8.13.24
Revised: 8.15.24
EXISTING FOREST COVER
'57.83
339.8'
19.75'
1 1 DRY WELL 72.75 cu ft
BUFFER
TO EDGE OF MARSH
'57.12
I hereby certify that these
documents were prepared or
approved by me, and that I am
a duly licensed professional
Landscape Architect under the
laws of the State of Maryland.
License No.: 627
Expiration Date: 09-19-2025
CURRENT FIELD SURVEY
RECORDED BY
RYAN ANDERSON #22071
MCCRONE
320 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
CENTERVILLE, MARYLAND 21617
410-758-2237
SEPTEMBER 2023
NOTE: BUFFER TO
EDGE OF MARSH
EXTENDS OUTSIDE
OF SHEET.
SEE SHEET BMP-4
BMP - 1 OF 4

NOTE: ADJUST PLANT LOCATION
TO FIT SITE CONDITIONS.
M
AVOID DISTURBANCE OF
EXISTING VEGETATION. 100' BUFFER
TO MHW
M
5 Winterberry
5 Redbud M
M
M
12 Hydrangea
M
S
5
10 Black Locust 1 9 3 9 Clethra M 6 ˚0 5
.1 '1
8 3
' "
W
M 1 4
40 Goldenrod 8 .5
0
'
7 Clethra
M
3 Red Cedar 12 Sumac
RCA IDA
RCA M RAIN GARDEN A
6 Itea 3 Winterberry 20 Bluestem
M
16" Sycamore Maple
11 Spiderwort
M
M 6 Clethra 1 Redbud
*
M * * * *
EDGE OF MARSH * * * * * * + + + + +
M + * + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ +
+ DECK
M + + + + +
+
FLOODPLAIN + 12" Black Cherry 12 Christmas Fern
ZONE LINE M 4 Winterberry 5 Ostrich Fern
+ DOWN
11.6" Stump
14" Paper Mulberry
+
+
LAWN 17 PA Sedge DOWN
24" Maple + + + + 26" Locust 42 Christmas Fern 54 Aster
IDA 17.9" Stump
24" Locust 18 Ostrich Fern 17 Inkberry
+ + + + + + 60 PA Sedge
5 Boxelder
5
N
19˚05'13"
E +
+
+
+ + + + + + + 11" Paper Mulber + ry + + + + +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ 26" Cherry
2" Dogwood 2
D W
ST
E
O
L
R
LI
Y
N G
+ +
57.74 +
+ + FRAME
1 0 4" Holly
+ + SHED PROPOSED COBBLESTONE 9" Cedar E M
1 5 + + DRIVEWAY 8" Holly
11.5" Crape Myrtle
+ + 20 Coralbells
16 Northern Bayberry + + + 13" Norway Maple
X
22.27
0 7 Sage x 22.27 WM
2
16" Crape Myrtle WV
N 27˚54'47" 231.01'10 Sage 12" Crape Myrtle M
B
WATSON ROAD 19 Viburnum
S 4 Serviceberry (NOT INCLUDED) S
16 Christmas Fern 10 Sage
7 Ostrich Fern
22 PA Sedge
1 Inkberry
12 Joe Pye 4 Serviceberry
15 Clethra 3 Inkberry
2 Inkberry (male)
6.460
DOWNSPOUT
PLANTING PLAN 35 Phlox
Darryl Savage
SCALE 1" = 30' 110 Watson Road
Centerville, Maryland 21617
LIMIT OF
RAIN GARDEN
BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN
RAIN GARDEN A
1/4" = 1'-0" AS NOTED EB
6.10.2024
Revised: 7.30.24
Revised: 8.13.24
Revised: 8.15.24
BMP - 2 OF 4
334.6

BUFFER MANAGEMENT SITE STATISTICS PLANT PALETTE
SITE AREA = 53,961 sq. ft. (1.239 ac +/-)
TREES
SITE AREA WITHIN CRITICAL AREA = 53,961 sq. ft. (1.239 ac +/-)
QUANTITY BOTANICAL NAME - COMMON NAME SIZE
AREA WITHIN 100' CRITICAL AREA BUFFER = 34,662.6 sq. ft. (.8 ac +/-)
5 Acer negundo – Boxelder 2" cal.
AREA WITHIN 200' EXPANDED BUFFER = 53,961 sq. ft. (1.239 ac +/-)
8 Amelanchier grandiflora ‘Autumn Brilliance’ - Serviceberry 6-8’ tall
AREA IN RCA = 29,898 sq. ft. (.69 ac.)
6 Cercis canadensis - Eastern Redbud 2" cal.
AREA IN IDA = 24,062 sq. ft. (.66 ac.)
3 Juniperus virginiana – Red Cedar 6’t
10 Robinia pseudoacacia – Black Locust 2"cal.
IMPERVIOUS AREA (ALLOWED)
15% RCA = 8,094.15 sq. ft
SHRUBS
100% IDA = 24,062 sq. ft.
37 Clethra alnifolia – Summersweet #1
21 Ilex glabra 'Compacta' - Compact Inkberry #1
EXISTING LOT COVERAGE
2 Ilex glabra 'Squeeze Box' – Male Inkberry #1
RCA 0 sq. ft.
10 Ilex verticillata ‘Little Goblin’ – Winterberry #1
IDA DWELLING/SHED/DECK = 2496.1 sq. ft.
2 Ilex verticillata 'Southern Gentleman' – Male Winterberry #1
PARKING/WALK =1813.25 sq. ft. TOTAL: 4,309.35 sq. ft.
6 Itea virginica ‘Henry’s Garnet’ – Summersweet #1
12 Hydrangea arborescens – Smooth Hydrangea #1
PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE
16 Myrica pensylvanica – Northern Bayberry #7
RCA 0 sq. ft. 0%
12 Rhus glabra - Smooth Sumac #1
IDA DWELLING/SHED = 2496.1 sq. ft.
19 Viburnum x pragense’ – Prague Viburnum #7
DRIVEWAY/WALKS = 1364.55 sq. ft. TOTAL: 3,860.65 sq. ft. (0.09 ac +/-) 4.7%
-- NON NATIVE, NOT INCLUDED IN MITIGATION.
NET DECREASE 493.7 sq. ft.
PERENNIALS & GRASSES
CRITICAL AREA 10%
54 Aster divaricatus - White Wood Aster 1 qt
3,860.65 sq. ft. Coverage x 10% = 386 sq ft. REQUIRED
99 Carex pensylvanica - Pennsylvania Sedge 1 qt
RAIN GARDEN A = 215 sq. ft.
12 Eupatorium dubium – Joe Pye Weed 1 qt
DRY WELL = 291 sq. ft.
20 Heuchera americana – Coral Bells 1 qt
TOTAL PROVIDED = 506 sq. ft.
30 Matteuccia struthiopteris - Ostrich Fern 1 qt
70 Polystichum acrostichoides – Christmas Fern 1 qt
AREA CLEARED OR DISTURBED = 2,807 sq. ft.
27 Salvia lyrata – Lyre Leaf Sage 1 qt
MITIGATION REQUIRED 1:3 = 8,421 sq. ft.
20 Schizachyrium scoparium – Little Bluestem 1 qt
40 Solidago sempervirens – Seaside Goldenrod 1 qt
VIOLATION
11 Tradescantia virginica - Spiderwort 1 qt
PENALTY: NUMBER OF TREES CLEARED = 2 (# 0F TREES)
MITIGATION FOR PENALTY: 2 X 4 = 8 TREES AT 2-1/2" TO 3" CALIPER
FEE IN LIEU (1600 sq. ft. X $1.50) = $2,400.00
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE NOTES
PLANTING PLAN AND LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 1. ALL PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE NATIVE TO THE CHESAPEAKE AND ATLANTIC COASTAL BAYS
REGION BASED ON THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PUBLICATION, NATIVE PLANTS FOR
WILDLIFE HABITAT AND CONSERVATION LANDSCAPING.
STEP ONE
2. SPECIES CLASSIFICATION (CANOPY TREE, UNDERSTORY TREE, ETC.) IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
-DISTURBANCE TO THE EXPANDED BUFFER.
MATURE HEIGHTS AS SET FORTH IN THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PUBLICATION,
-MITIGATION IS REQUIRED.
NATIVE
PLANTS FOR WILDLIFE HABITAT AND CONSERVATION LANDSCAPING.
STEP TWO
3. SPECIES HAVE BEEN SELECTED BASED ON AN ANALYSIS OF SURROUNDING NATIVE FOREST
-SHORE EROSION CONTROL
AND DEVELOPED WOODLAND COVER.
-BUFFER DISTURBANCE MITIGATION
4. SHRUB SPECIES COMPRISE _43_ PERCENT OF THE PROPOSED PLANTING, WHICH
AREA DISTURBED 2,807 SQ. FT. X MITIGATION RATIO 1:2 = 8,421 SQ. FT
DOES NOT EXCEED 50 PERCENT OF THE OVERALL PLANTING.
5. THE QUANTITY OF ANY SINGLE SPECIES DOES NOT EXCEED 20 PERCENT OF THE OVERALL
STEP THREE
PLANTING
MITIGATION FOR CLEARING TREES
6. OFF-SITE TREES (12) TO BE MARYLAND NATIVE. CONTACT TOWN OF CENTEREVILLE PUBLIC
-1 INVASIVE SPECIES TREES TO BE REMOVED = 1 TREE PLANTED
WORKS TO DETERMINE DESIRED SPECIES AND LOCATION WHERE 12 TREES CAN BE PLANTED
ON TOWN PROPERTY.
VIOLATION
MARYLAND NATIVE TREES INCLUDE; Acer negundo – Boxelder, Acer rubrum – Red Maple, Celtis
2 TREES REMOVED = 4:1 = 8 TREES TO BE PLANTED
occidentalis – Common Hackberry, Juniperus virginiana – Red Cedar, Robinia pseudoacacia – Black
Locust, Salix exigua – Coyote Willow, Ulmus americana - American Elm
STEP FOUR
TOTAL MITIGATION
BUFFER DISTURBANCE = 2,807 SF 3:1 = 8,421 SF
TREE CLEARING = 1 TREES 3:1 = 3 TREES = 600 SF DRY WELL DETAILS
VIOLATION = 2 TREES 4:1 = 8 TREES = 1,600 SF
TOTAL MITIGATION = 10,621 SF
STEP FIVE
RAIN GARDEN CONSTRUCTION NOTES
ESTABLISHMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE THE BUFFER
-SITE IS INSIDE EXPANDED BUFER. 1 RAIN GARDENS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AFTER ALL UPSTREAM AREAS
HAVE BEEN STABILIZED WITH EITHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR TOPSOIL AND
STEP SIX VEGETATION.
ADJUST FOR FOREST COVER 2 RAIN GARDEN EXCAVATION SHALL BE ROUGH AND UNCOMPACTED. IF
-SITE AREA = 81,314.9 sq. ft. (1.86 ac+/-)
SMEARING OF BOTTOM OR WALLS OCCURS, SCRATCH WITH A RAKE AS
-SITE AREA WITHIN CRITICAL AREA = 81,314.9 sq. ft. (1.86 ac+/-)
NECESSARY TO EXPOSE ROUGH EARTH.
-AREA WITHIN 100' CRITICAL AREA BUFFER = 66,247.9 sq. ft. (1.52 ac. +/-)
3 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS SHOULD BE INSTALLED DURING THE SPRING
-APPROX. 7,973 SQ. FT FORESTED WITHIN 100' BUFFER
OR FALL IF POSSIBLE.
-APPROX. 4,767 SF FORESTED OUTSIDE 100' BUFFER
AND WITHIN EXPANDED BUFFER 4 OVERFLOW FROM RAIN GARDEN SHALL BE DIRECTED OVER A 3" DEEP
BY 10' WIDE DEPRESSION IN THE PERIMETER BERM AND SHALL NOT BE A
STEP 7 SOURCE OF DOWNSTREAM EROSION.
CLUSTER PLANTING EVALUATION THE OWNER IS ENCOURAGED TO ENHANCE THE VISUAL APPEAL OF THE RAIN
-TOTAL MITIGATION IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE GARDEN BY USING STONE OR TIMBER RETAINING WALLS INSTEAD OF USING
EXCAVATED SOIL. EPDM LINER MAY BE NEEDED TO MAKE A WATERTIGHT WALL.
CLUSTER OPTIONS
SOIL SPECIFICATIONS
MAXIMUM
CREDIT MAXIMUM 1 THE RAIN GARDEN PLANTING SOIL SHALL HAVE A COMPOSITION OF 50%
VEGETATION TYPE MINIMUM SIZE ELIGIBLE FOR CREDIT PERCENT QUANTITY
ALLOWED SAND, 20% WOOD CHIPS LEAVES, AND 30% TOPSOIL.
OF CREDIT
(SF) 2 SOIL SHALL BE OF UNIFORM COMPOSITION, FREE OF STONES, STUMPS,
PLANTING CLUSTER 1 CANOPY TREE W/ 3 LARGE SHRUBS OR 300 N/A N.A. ROOTS OR SIMILAR OBJECTS LARGER THAN ONE INCH.
1 1 CANOPY TREE W/ 6 SMALL SHRUBS 3 SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS AND PLANTS (OR PLANT PARTS) OF
PLANTING CLUSTER 2 UNDERSTORY TREES W/ 3 LARGE SHRUBS 350 N/A N.A. BERMUDA GRASS, QUACK GRASS, JOHNSON GRASS, MUGWORT, NUTSEDGE,
2 OR 2 UNDERSTORY TRES W/ 6 SMALL SHRUBS POISON IVY, OR CANADIAN THISTLE.
4 PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE OVERFILLED BY 2-3" TO ALLOW FOR SETTLING.
STEP 8 DO NOT COMPACT.
TOTAL REQUIRED BUFFER PLANTING
MAINTENANCE CRITERIA:
BUFFER DISTURBANCE MITIGATION 8,421 SF
VIOLATION 1,600 SF 1 WATER PLANTS LIBERALLY THE FIRST GROWING SEASON AND DURING
BUFFER ESTABLISHMENT + 0 SF PERIODS OF DROUGHT THEREAFTE
2 REMOVE ACCUMULATED TRASH AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS EVERY FEW
TOTAL PLANTING REQUIRED 10,021 SF MONTHS AND ENSURE THAT INFLO PIPE(S) FLOW FREELY.
3 PRUNE AND REMOVE DEAD VEGETATION PERIODICALLY, AS WITH ANY
PLANTING
LANDSCAPE BED. IF SPECIFIC PLA ARE NOT SURVIVING, REPLACE WITH A
33 TREES REQUIRED
DIFFERENT SPECIES. WATERING MAY BE REQUIRED DURING PROLONGED DRY
21 TREES ON SITE
PERIODS.
12 TREES TO BE PLANTED OFF SITE (See Note #6.)
Darryl Savage
33 TREES PROVIDED 5,400 4 SILTS AND SEDIMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE OF
THE FILTER BED WHEN ACCUMULAT EXCEEDS ONE INCH.
110 Watson Road
50 LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED THE TOP FEW INCHES OF FILTER MEDIA SHOULD BE REMOVED AND REPLACED Centerville, Maryland 21617
57 LARGE SHRUBS PROVIDED 2850 WH
WATER PONDS FOR MORE THAN 48 HOURS.
67 SMALL SHRUBS REQUIRED 5 REFRESH MULCH WITH AN ADDITIONAL THIN LAYER ANNUALLY. REMOVE
61 SMALL SHRUBS PROVIDED 1525 ALL MULCH AND REPLACE WITH NEW THREE-INCH LAYER EVERY 3-5 YEARS. RAIN GARDEN DETAILS BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN
421 PERENNIALS REQUIRED AS NOTED EB
421 PERENNIALS PROVIDED 842
6.10.2024
TOTAL PLANTING PROVIDED 10,617 SF Revised: 7.30.24
Revised: 8.13.24
Revised: 8.15.24
BMP - 3 OF 3

115.76' S 43˚36'57"
E
115.76' S 43˚36'57"
E
129.82' 129.82'
N 61˚27'03" E
308.94'
N 61˚27'03" E
308.94'
193.18' 193.18'
20
15 10
N
5 19˚05'13" E 57.74 M M
M
201.52'
20
15 10
N
5 19˚05'13" E 57.74 M M
M
201.52'
24" Maple 11.6" Stump M 24" Maple 11.6" Stump M
M 273.32' M 273.32'
S 11" Paper Mulbe
1
r
4
ry
"
1
P
7
a
.9
p
"
e
S
r
t
M
um
ulb
p
erry M
M M
N 32˚53'33" E
S 11" Paper Mulbe
1
r
4
ry
"
1
P
7
a
.9
p
"
e
S
r
t
M
um
ulb
p
erry M
M M
N 32˚53'33" E
24" Locust M PROPERTY LINE 24" Locust M PROPERTY LINE
26" Locust 12" Black Cherry M M 26" Locust 12" Black Cherry M M
M EDGE OF MARSH M EDGE OF MARSH
N 27˚54'47"231.01'
M 71.80'
N 27˚54'47"231.01'
M 71.80'
M M
3 6
8' B U F F E R 230.950 12" Crape Myrtle 13 1 " 6 N " o C r r w a a p y e M M a y p rt l l e e 8" Holly
M
X
B
22 9 2 . 6 " 2 7 " C C e h d e a r r ry 11.5" 4 C " r a H p o e l ly Myrtle 2" Dogwood DO DO W WN N 16" Sycamore Maple S 56 M ˚05'13" W148.50' M M M
E
P S
X
R TE
I
O
S
E P
T
P O
IN
S S
G
L E O
H
D P
O
D E
U
R
S
IV
E
EWAY
3 6
8' B U F F E R 12" Crape Myrtle 13 1 " 6 N " o C r r w a a p y e M M a y p rt l l e e 8" Holly
M
X
B
22 9 2 . " 6 2 7 " C C e h d e a r r ry 11.5" 4 C " r a H p o e l ly Myrtle 2" Dogwood DO DO W WN N 16" Sycamore Maple S 56 M ˚05'13" W148.50' M M M
E
P S
X
R TE
I
O
S
E P
T
P O
IN
S S
G
L E O
H
D P
O
D E
U
R
S
IV
E
EWAY
S WVWM EM S WVWM EM
EXPANDED BUFFER EXPANDED BUFFER
EXPANDED BUFFER ILLUSTRATION 1 BUFFER TO EDGE OF MARSH EXPANDED BUFFER ILLUSTRATION 2 BUFFER TO EDGE OF MARSH
EXPANDED BY 4' FOR EVERY EXPANDED BY 4' FOR EVERY
1" = 50' 1" = 50'
1% OF SLOPE. 1% OF SLOPE.
67% SLOPE X 4" = 268' + 100' BUFFER 67% SLOPE X 4" = 268' + 100' BUFFER
TO EDGE OF MARSH TO EDGE OF MARSH
Darryl Savage
110 Watson Road
Centerville, Maryland 21617
BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN
AS NOTED EB
6.10.2024
Revised: 7.30.24
Revised: 8.13.24
Revised: 8.15.24
BMP - 4 OF 4

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
Queen 1 1 0 Vincit Street, Suite 104
Centreville, MD 21617
Anne’s
Telephone Planning: (410) 758-1255
County
Fax Planning: (410) 758-2905
Telephone Permits: (410) 758-4088
Fax Permits: (410) 758-3972
QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY
MINOR BUFFER ESTABLISHMENT
MINOR BUFFER MANAGEMENT PLAN
LESS THAN 5,000 SF
This form should be completed by the property owner or responsible party for any disturbance of
natural vegetation, new development or redevelopment that increases lot coverage within the Critical
Area. Once completed and approved, this form will constitute your Buffer Management Plan and will
provide our office with an official record of your proposed impact and the way in which you plan to
offset that impact. (i.e.: mitigation) Please contact the Permit Office at 410-758-4088 for any
assistance in completing this form.
Buffer Management Plan: A plan is required at the time of permit application for disturbance within
the 100 ft Buffer less than 5,000 square feet of disturbance. Therefore a licensed professional shall be
required for over 5,000 sq. ft.
Buffer Establishment: A plan is required at the time of application of a permit, when development or
redevelopment activity occurs on a lot or parcel that includes a buffer to tidal waters, a tidal wetland,
or a tributary stream and that development or redevelopment activity is located outside the 100 foot
Buffer and/or the Buffer is not fully forested or established in woody or wetland vegetation. Buffer
Establishment cannot exceed 5,000 square feet with this form. Therefore a licensed professional shall
be required for over 5,000 sq. ft.
A minor buffer management plan shall include:
(1) A plan that shows the proposed limit of disturbance (a minimum ten foot area around
construction), the total number and size of trees to be removed, if applicable, and the
arrangement of the planting to be done; the plan should also show the location of the 100 foot
Buffer on the lot.
(2) A landscape schedule that shows the proposed species type, the quantity of plants, the size
of plants to be installed, and the planting date;
(3) A maintenance plan for the control of invasive species, pests, and predation that shows
invasive species and pest control practices, the provision of at least 2 years of monitoring, and a
reinforcement planting provision if survival rates fall below the standards.
(4) An inspection agreement that grants permission to the local jurisdiction to inspect the
plantings at appropriate times;
Revised 12/8/15 1

PART 1 Property Background Information
Please complete the following: Date:6 /10 /2024
Name of Property Owner (or Contact): Darryl Savage Phone:
Property Owner’s Address: 110 Watson Rd, Centerville, MD 21617
Project Address (if different):
Tax Map #: 35H Parcel #: 1295 Lot #:
Critical Area Designation: LDA RCA X IDA X
PART 2 Proposed Disturbance(s)
Please check the purpose(s) for your proposed disturbance(s) to the Buffer:
(cid:0) New development/redevelopment (ex. new building, addition to home, replacement of
structures) (Associated permit/variance #: )
(cid:0) REQUIRED Buffer Establishment for new subdivision
(Associated subdivision #: )
(cid:0)X Other (please explain): new driveway, replace wood deck
PART 3: Mitigation Ratios
Different types of Buffer management activities will require different mitigation ratios. The purpose of
the mitigation is to improve the Buffer functions where possible. The table below provides the
mitigation ratio for different types of Buffer management activities. Please note: mitigation ratios are
cumulative.
Activity Mitigation Ratio
Development or redevelopment of water-dependent facilities 2:1
Variance 2:1
X Violations 4:1
Paved Patios 1:1
X Driveways 1:1
Pools, Fire Pits and other such Disturbance 1:1
Mitigation Ratio = 1:1, 4:1 (from above table)
Revised 12/8/15 3

STEP 1 Calculation of Mitigation for Minor Buffer Management
Area cleared or disturbed = 2,523 (sq. ft.)
-AND/OR-
Number of trees cleared = 2 + 2* (# of trees)
Example: (1) 12” caliper tree X 100 sq.ft. = 1200 sq.ft. disturbance
• 2 trees were removed before application
PART 4: Minor Buffer Establishment
At the time of application, if the buffer is not fully forested or is not fully established in woody or
wetland vegetation, an applicant shall establish the buffer to the extent required in the following table:
A. Lot Created Before Local B. Lot Created After Local
Development Category
Program Adoption Program Adoption
C. Establish the buffer based on
New development on a vacant lot D. Fully establish the buffer
total lot coverage
New subdivision or new lot Fully establish the buffer
New lot with an existing dwelling unit Establish the buffer based on total lot coverage
Conversion of a land use on a parcel or
Fully establish the buffer
lot to another land use
Addition or accessory structure Establish the buffer based on net increase in lot coverage
Substantial alteration Establish the buffer based on total lot coverage
Are there any special plat notes or restrictions concerning your Buffer (ex. wetlands,
habitat protection areas, BEA, conservation easements)? Yes__X___ No_____
If yes, please explain:
Site is entirely within the buffer. The residence is restricted by topography and sits closely adjacent to
Watson Road.
STEP 5: Calculation of Mitigation for Buffer Establishment
Area cleared or disturbed = 2,523 (sq. ft.)
-AND/OR-
Number of trees cleared = 2 + 2* (# of trees)
Example: (1) 12” caliper tree X 100 sq.ft. = 1200 sq.ft. disturbance
• 2 trees were removed before application
Revised 12/8/15 4

PART 5: How to Convert Square Feet to Number of Trees
A local jurisdiction shall apply the following planting credits for the type and size of the vegetation
proposed:
Maximum Credit Allowed Maximum Percent # of Plants
Vegetation Type Minimum Size Eligible for Credit
(Sqsquare Feet) of Credit
Canopy tree 2-inch caliper and 8 feet high 200 Not applicable 9
Canopy tree 1-inch caliper and 6 feet high 100 Not applicable
Understory tree 1-inch caliper and 6 feet high 75 Not applicable 5
Large shrub 1 gallon and 4 feet high 50 30 72
Small shrub 1 gallon and 18 inches high 25 20
Herbaceous
1 quart 2 10
perennial*
Planting Cluster 1 canopy tree; and 3 large shrubs or
300 Not applicable
1* 6 small shrubs of sizes listed above
2 understory trees; and 3 large
Planting Cluster
shrubs or 6 small shrubs of sizes 350 Not applicable
2*
listed above
STEP 3: TOTAL PLANTINGS REQUIRED
#Buffer Management Plants = 10,021sq ft
#Buffer Establishment Plants = 0
# Trees to be replaced = 2 + 2*
- Replace 1 Norway Maple, Replace 1 Nellie Stevens Holly. 3:1 mitigation
• 2 Trees removed before application. Each is to be replaced with four trees at 2” caliper size.
These options are available only for buffer establishment and buffer mitigation of less than 1 acre.
PART 6: Fee in Lieu
The current rate for fee in lieu is $1.50 per square foot of disturbance.
# of trees 2 X tree caliper 2-1/2” X 100 sq.ft. = 500 sq ft x $1.50 = $750.00
= Amount to be paid $
Revised 12/8/15 5

BUFFER PLANTINGS LOCATION
All mitigation shall be located within the Critical Area. The plantings should be located according to
the following order of preference:
1. On-site within the 100’ Buffer (required first mitigation area)
2. On-site: Immediately adjacent to existing Buffer
3. On-site: elsewhere in Critical Area (outside Buffer)
4. A local jurisdiction may authorize off-site planting in the buffer if this option is part of a
local Critical Area program approved by the Commission or the subject of a written
agreement between the local jurisdiction and the Commission.
5. All plantings must be native to Maryland.
JUSTIFICATION:
Please provide a brief explanation of your proposed project in the space below.
Site is entirely within the critical area buffer. Care will be taken to minimize construction disturbance.
Proposed landscape and hardscape changes to an existing residence include replacing an old wood
deck, removing parking spaces in conflict with traffic because of hidden access, and building a
driveway so the owner can park without walking in Watson Road.
Revised 12/8/15 6

Revised 12/8/15 7

Wes Moore Erik Fisher
Governor Chair
Aruna Miller Katherine Charbonneau
Lt. Governor Executive Director
STATE OF MARYLAND
CRITICAL AREA COMMISSION
CHESAPEAKE AND ATLANTIC COASTAL BAYS
August 12, 2024
Ms. Carolyn Brinkley, Town Manager
Town of Centreville
101 Lawyer’s Row
Centreville, MD 21617
Re: Savage Variance (Tax Map 35H, Parcel 1295)
Dear Ms. Brinkley:
Thank you for providing information regarding the variance referenced above. The applicant is
requesting a variance to Chapter 170-31.12 of the Town of Centreville’s Critical Area Program
to disturb the Buffer to replace an existing deck and construct a new driveway and walkways.
The project is located at 110 Watson Road, Centreville. The 1.24-acre property is located
entirely within the Critical Area on land designated as Resource Conservation Area (RCA) and
Intensely Developed Area (IDA).
Existing lot coverage (dwelling, deck, shed, parking, walkways) is 4,309 square feet (sf).
Proposed lot coverage (dwelling, deck, shed, driveway, walkways) is 3,861 sf which is a
decrease in lot coverage of 448 sf. Two (2) existing gravel parking areas will be removed, and a
new driveway and walkways are proposed. All existing and proposed lot coverage is located
within the IDA.
A site visit was conducted on May 14, 2023; Town staff, Critical Area staff, and consultants for
the project were in attendance. Based on the site visit and a review of the submitted information,
we have the following comments:
Critical Area Buffer
• Per COMAR 27.01.09.01.E(3), the Buffer must be delineated based on existing field
conditions at the time of the development proposal and is measured at least 100 feet
landward from the mean high water line (MHWL) of tidal waters, the edge of each bank
of a tributary stream, and the upland boundary of a tidal wetland. Per COMAR
27.01.09.01.E(7), the Buffer must be expanded when it is contiguous to a steep slope, a
nontidal wetland, a hydric soil, or a highly erodible soil.
• The plan shows several red lines labeled as Buffer. The red line currently labeled “100’
Buffer to Edge of Marsh” appears to be the location of the 100-foot Buffer. However, it is
1804 West Street, Suite 100, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 – (410) 260-3460
dnr.maryland.gov/criticalarea/ – TTY users call via the Maryland Relay Service

Ms. Carolyn Brinkley
August 12, 2024
Page 2
unclear if the edge of the marsh corresponds exactly to the edge of tidal wetlands and/or
if the Buffer must be expanded as required in the bullet above.
• Please have the applicant submit a revised plan showing an accurate Critical Area Buffer,
expanded as required.
• In order to provide timely comments and based on observations made during the site visit
and communication with Town staff and consultants, it is assumed that the entire project
is located within the Critical Area Buffer. If revised information indicates that a portion
of the project is located outside the Critical Area Buffer, then the comments in this letter
regarding the variance request apply only to the portion of the project located within the
Critical Area Buffer.
Variance Request
• The applicant is seeking a variance to locate a driveway and walkways in the Buffer.
Total proposed new lot coverage within the Buffer is 1,365 sf. The applicant proposes to
remove existing lot coverage within the Buffer. A variance is not required to remove lot
coverage from the Buffer.
• The Board of Appeals must determine if the applicant meets all of the Town of
Centreville’s variance standards in order to grant a variance. These include finding that a
literal enforcement of the local Critical Area Program would result in an unwarranted
hardship to the applicant and that the granting of the variance would be in harmony with
the general spirit and intent of the Critical Area Law, the Critical Area regulations, and
the local Critical Area Program. If the Board does grant the variance, the applicant must
provide mitigation in accordance with Town of Centreville’s Critical Area program.
• The proposed pull-off driveway and walkways are something that our office would not
typically support as they are located entirely within the Buffer. However, based on
discussions during the site visit, it is our understanding that the project is being proposed
to address safety considerations. Therefore, we recommend that the Board request
additional clarification from the applicant regarding how the proposal would address the
safety concerns. Specifically, the Board may wish to ask the applicant if the proposal is
the minimum relief needed to address the safety concerns and why the existing gravel
parking areas are not adequate from a safety standpoint.
Mitigation
• If the Board does grant the variance, the applicant must provide mitigation in accordance
with the Town’s Critical Area program. Per COMAR 27.01.09.01-2.H, variances
require 3:1 mitigation for Buffer disturbance.
• The applicant submitted a Buffer Management Plan (BMP) that proposes 10,617 sf of
planting. In addition, twelve (12) trees will be planted offsite at a Town-owned property.
10% Critical Area Stormwater Management
• If a variance is approved for the project, 10% Critical Area stormwater management is
required since the project is located within the IDA. Total lot coverage will decrease, and
the applicant proposes a rain garden and a dry well to provided stormwater management;
therefore, the Critical Area pollutant reduction requirement has been met.

Ms. Carolyn Brinkley
August 12, 2024
Page 3
Other
• The County confirmed that the deck was constructed in 1987; therefore, as long as the
deck is replaced in kind, our office does not have additional comments regarding the deck
replacement.
• The BMP includes 4:1 mitigation for a previous violation identified on the property. As
long as the Town is satisfied that appropriate mitigation has been provided; this office has
no further comments regarding the violation.
• A phragmites removal program has recently altered the shoreline. Due to the loss of land,
it was noted during the site visit that the homeowner may want to explore options for
shoreline stabilization. If so, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) offers
a pre-application meeting to discuss the approval process on-site. Based on
communication with MDE, when reviewing the parcel on the Maryland Shoreline
Stabilization Mapper the program indicates a Living Shoreline would be the preferred
method of shoreline stabilization.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Please include this letter as part of the
record in this variance application. Please notify the Critical Area Commission of the decision
made in this case. If you have any questions, you may contact me at (410) 260-3476 or
susana.makhlouf@maryland.gov.
Sincerely,
Susan Makhlouf
Natural Resources Planner
cc: Nick Kelly, Critical Area Commission
Claudia Jones, Critical Area Commission
File: CV 0164-24

THE TOWN OF CENTREVILLE 101 LAWYERS ROW CENTREVILLE, MD 21617
410-758-1180 FAX 410-758-4741 WWW.TOWNOFCENTREVILLE.ORG
MEMORANDUM
August 15, 2024
TO: Centreville Planning Commission
FR: Michael Whitehill, Whitehill Consulting, LLC
Carolyn Brinkley, Town Manager
RE: 110 Watson Road – Variance Request – V-03-24
The applicant/owner, Darryl Savage, 110 Watson Road, is requesting a variance to Chapter 170-
31.12 of the Town of Centreville’s Critical Area Program to disturb the Buffer to replace and
locate a new driveway and walkways in the Critical Area Buffer. The property is 1.24 acres,
zoned R-2, located entirely within the Critical Area on land designated as Resource Conservation
Area (RCA) and Intensely Developed Area (IDA).
The existing lot coverage, which includes the dwelling, deck, shed, parking, and walkways, is
4,309 sf. The proposed lot coverage that includes the dwelling deck, shed, parking, walkways, is
3,861 sf.; a decrease in lot coverage of 448 sf. Two existing gravel parking areas will be
removed, and a new driveway and walkways are proposed. All existing and proposed lot
coverage is located within the IDA.
Michael Whitehill, Carolyn Brinkley, and consultants for the property owner, and Critical Area
staff met on-site on May 14, 2024. Staff from the Critical Area Commission provided comments
and opinions based on this site visit which are attached to this memo however, summarized
below:
Variance Request
• The applicant is seeking a variance to locate a driveway and walkways in the Buffer.
Total proposed new lot coverage within the Buffer is 1,365 sf. The applicant proposes to
remove existing lot coverage within the Buffer. A variance is not required to remove lot
coverage from the Buffer.
• The Board of Appeals must determine if the applicant meets all the Town of Centreville’s
variance standards in order to grant a variance. These include finding that a literal
enforcement of the local Critical Area Program would result in an unwarranted hardship
to the applicant and that the granting of the variance would be in harmony with the
general spirit and intent of the Critical Area Law, the Critical Area regulations, and the
local Critical Area Program. If the Board does grant the variance, the applicant must
provide mitigation in accordance with Town of Centreville’s Critical Area program.
• The proposed pull-off driveway and walkways are something that our office would not
typically support as they are located entirely within the Buffer. However, based on

discussions during the site visit, it is our understanding that the project is being proposed
to address safety considerations. Therefore, we recommend that the Board request
additional clarification from the applicant regarding how the proposal would address the
safety concerns. Specifically, the Board may wish to ask the applicant if the proposal is
the minimum relief needed to address the safety concerns and why the existing gravel
parking areas are not adequate from a safety standpoint.
Mitigation
• If the Board does grant the variance, the applicant must provide mitigation in accordance
with the Town’s Critical Area program. Per COMAR 27.01.09.01-2.H, variances require
3:1 mitigation for Buffer disturbance.
• The applicant submitted a Buffer Management Plan (BMP) that proposes 10,617 sf of
planting. In addition, twelve (12) trees will be planted offsite at a Town-owned property.
10% Critical Area Stormwater Management
• If a variance is approved for the project, 10% Critical Area stormwater management is
required since the project is located within the IDA. Total lot coverage will decrease, and
the applicant proposes a rain garden and a dry well to provided stormwater management;
therefore, the Critical Area pollutant reduction requirement has been met.
Phragmites
The ongoing eradication of the phragmites initiated by the Town is to continue. The Town will
be replanting the entire marsh area from Watson Road to the limits of eradication on the
Chesterfield Farm, when the eradication is complete in the summer of 2025. This eradication
area is treating an invasive (not natural) species and is not within in the 100’ shore buffer as
depicted on the applicant’s plans: Buffer Management & Protection Standards states, "Removal
of natural vegetation within the 100-foot buffer and expanded buffer is prohibited." The
applicant is seeking a variance for that provision as well as adding lot coverage within the buffer.
Conclusion - Recommendation
In accordance with 170-59 C.1.b Planning Commission’s review is to evaluate the proposal as to
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and provide comment to the Board of Appeals.
If information is satisfactory – proposed motion:
Finding consistency with the Town of Centreville Comprehensive Plan: 2040 the Planning
Commission does hereby forward a favorable recommendation to the Board of Appeals for the
variance request regarding the property located 110 Watson Road for the purpose of constructing
a new driveway and walkways as shown in Case V-03-24 within the Critical Area Buffer.

5 4 3 2 1
DunningGroup
a r c h i t e c t s
a professional limited liability company
14420 Albemarle Point Place,
E Suite 230 E
Chantilly, Virginia 20151
703.378.7991 703.378.7994 (fax)
www.dunningarchitects.com
PROJECT:
TENANT TENANT
CENTREVILLE
TENANT TENANT
BUSINESS
PARK
at
CENTERVILLE, MD
D D
DEVELOPER:
FRONT ELEVATION - RETAIL BUILDING @ LOT O
1
1 SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE
DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR
APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A
DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 15038,
EXPIRATION DATE: MAY 23, 2025.
C C
PROFESSIONAL SEAL:
ISSUED: DATE:
PRESENTATION JULY 26, 2024
TENANT
NO. REVISION: DATE:
B B
DESIGNED/DRAWN BY: -
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY: RPD
PROJECT NO: 2024-000
SCALE: AS NOTED
THE DOCUMENT AND IDEAS AND
DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN AS AN
INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE, IS THE PROPERTY OF DUNNING
GROUP ARCHITECTS, LLC AND IS NOT TO
BE COPIED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN
PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF DUNNING GROUP ARCHITECTS, LLC.
SHEET TITLE:
LOT O
A BUILDING A
SIDE ELEVATION - RETAIL BUILDING @ LOT O
2
ELEVATIONS
1 SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
SHEET NUMBER:
1 of 3
5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1
DunningGroup
a r c h i t e c t s
a professional limited liability company
14420 Albemarle Point Place,
E Suite 230 E
Chantilly, Virginia 20151
703.378.7991 703.378.7994 (fax)
www.dunningarchitects.com
PROJECT:
CENTREVILLE
BUSINESS
PARK
at
CENTERVILLE, MD
D D
DEVELOPER:
TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE
DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR
APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A
DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 15038,
EXPIRATION DATE: MAY 23, 2025.
C C
PROFESSIONAL SEAL:
ISSUED: DATE:
PRESENTATION JULY 26, 2024
FRONT ELEVATION - RETAIL BUILDING @ LOT P
1
2 SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" NO. REVISION: DATE:
B B
DESIGNED/DRAWN BY: -
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY: RPD
PROJECT NO: 2024-000
SCALE: AS NOTED
THE DOCUMENT AND IDEAS AND
DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN AS AN
INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE, IS THE PROPERTY OF DUNNING
GROUP ARCHITECTS, LLC AND IS NOT TO
BE COPIED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN
PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF DUNNING GROUP ARCHITECTS, LLC.
SHEET TITLE:
LOT P
A BUILDING A
ELEVATION-
SHEET NUMBER:
2 of 3
5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1
DunningGroup
a r c h i t e c t s
a professional limited liability company
14420 Albemarle Point Place,
E Suite 230 E
Chantilly, Virginia 20151
703.378.7991 703.378.7994 (fax)
www.dunningarchitects.com
PROJECT:
CENTREVILLE
BUSINESS
PARK
at
CENTERVILLE, MD
D D
DEVELOPER:
Advance Auto Parts
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE
DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR
APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A
DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 15038,
EXPIRATION DATE: MAY 23, 2025.
C C
PROFESSIONAL SEAL:
ISSUED: DATE:
PRESENTATION JULY 26, 2024
NO. REVISION: DATE:
AUTO PARTS BUILDING
B 1 B
3 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
DESIGNED/DRAWN BY: -
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY: RPD
PROJECT NO: 2024-000
SCALE: AS NOTED
THE DOCUMENT AND IDEAS AND
DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN AS AN
INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE, IS THE PROPERTY OF DUNNING
GROUP ARCHITECTS, LLC AND IS NOT TO
BE COPIED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN
PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF DUNNING GROUP ARCHITECTS, LLC.
SHEET TITLE:
AUTO
A PARTS A
BUILDING
SHEET NUMBER:
3 of 3
5 4 3 2 1

MEMORANDUM
TO: TOWN OF CENTREVILLE FROM:
PLANNING COMMISSION STACEY DAHLSTROM, AICP
SENIOR PLANNER EPR &
MIKE WHITEHILL,
TOWN ENGINEER,
WHITEHILL CONSULTING, LLC
ORGANIZATION: CENTREVILLE MD DATE: AUGUST 16, 2024
Re: Concept Minor Subdivision (4 lots or less)
and Concept Site Plan for a Proposed
Commercial Development on Proposed Lots N,
O, and P in the Centreville Business Park, Lands
of Coursevall, LLC Q.A. County Tax Map 44E,
Parcel 98
 URGENT X FOR YOUR USE  PLEASE COMMENT PLEASE REPLY PLEASE
RECYCLE
Introduction
The Applicant seeks Concept Minor Subdivision (4 lots or less) and Concept Site Plan for proposed
Commercial Development on proposed lots N, O, and P in the Centreville Business Park.
This application is §138-60 Concept (Sketch Plan) 138-62 Minor Subdivision Plan and Concept Site
Plan Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission’s role is to review and approve, conditionally
approve, or reject this application. Review, comment and feedback is important to assist in further
consideration as the project is reviewed and to avoid confusion.
The subject property is currently vacant, and if approved, the site would consist of three (3) lots of
record identified as Lots N, O, and P of Parcel 98 in Grid 18 on Tax Map 44. The lots are located on
the section of the Centreville Business Park on the north side of Laser Drive and comprises
approximately 5.044 acres of land area (1.164 acres- Lot N, 1.085 acre – Lot O and 2.75 acres-Lot
P). The lots are unimproved and are proposed to be developed as retail store containing 4 retail
structures, one each on lots N and O and 2 structures on Lot P. Lot P structures are proposed to
consist of one 11,000 square foot building, and one approximately 15,000 square foot building,
totaling approximately 25,640 total floor area. The structure on Lot N is proposed to consist of 6,889
1

square feet of floor area and the structure on Lot O is proposed to consist of a restaurant ((identified
as fast-food) with drive through access) with approximately 6,200 square feet of floor area and 3,775
square feet of retail floor area.
The applicant notes that 229 onsite parking spaces are required, and requests shared parking to
provide 205 spaces along with associated improvements.
This application was reviewed by the Town of Centreville Technical Advisory Committee on
Monday, April 22, 2024 the minutes are included in your package and the applicant has provided
responses and updated their submittal including responses to those comments.
Future Land Use (FLU) and Zoning: Office/Light Industrial (FLU) and Planned Business District
(Zoning)
Location
The location of the proposed lots are shown in the attached snips from the Concept submission
documents, QAC property View and Google Maps to provide an image re the larger context of the
location of the property.
Conceptual Subdivision Lots N, O & P
2

2024 Property View Aerial
Google Aerial View 2024
3

Comments
Please note these items include/address our review of responses the applicant provided to TAC
comments which are included here for your reference. Please see submittal letter included in your
package for applicant responses.
1. Note: At the bottom of the Applicant’s submittal letter it states “We Acknowledge that the
Town of Centreville Council approved the award of 16 sewer and water allocations for this
project. We note that the 20% deposit has been paid to the town to secure these allocations.”
This is to clarify that the Town of Centreville Council has not yet considered this
allocation, as it’s not eligible until site plan approval is completed.
2. TAC Review: “• New open cut with placement of a hydrant and sanitary and storm drain for
Taco Bell. When improvements are made to Laser Drive, mill and overlay from 213 to the
cul-de-sac and up to Coursevall where Mr. Emory terminated his previous construction will
be required. Curb and gutter to be in place at the time of the final overlay.”
Engineering/Planning response: The Town has not approved or taken title to Laser, therefore the
source of payment for the overlay from Rte. 213 to south of the Dunkin’ access (Stella Lane) must
be worked out by others. But pavement overlay will be nevertheless required.
3. TAC Review: “• 28,960 square feet of a wooded patch that sits on Laser Drive that is not
acknowledged – compensation for this wooded area will have to be completed. A fully
wooded buffer along 213 with a berm graded out will have to be offset either in the
landscaping plan or in some other way onsite.”
Engineering/Planning response: A “patch of woods” (similar in nature to that on our subject site)
behind the previously approved E-1 building was removed and mitigated for the E-1 building. I see
no reason why this similarly evolved larger plot (0.66 acres) should not be mitigated. Mitigation
does not have to occur on these lots.
4. TAC Review: “• Legal document required to allow parking in 30’ easement for parking area of lots
N & O. 60- or 45-degree diagonal parking on a one way out from the drive-thru or parallel parking
in at least that segment. Food pick-up parking is also an option to get parking out of that
easement.”
4

Engineering/Planning response: The plat reference provided by the developer is for the Dunkin’
site where the 5’ is indeed shown but that “Take” is not shown thereon for any other portion of the
CBP property. Please provide recorded MSHA plat of the whole take. This action does not affect
the path easement which runs parallel to and 30’ from the highway r/w and does not peremptorily
make the Town’s required 30’ easement 25’. This is a question for our Town Attorney to further
contemplate In any event, it is recommended that the applicant amend the plats and depict the full
30’ as it now would have no material effect on the existing layout which now shows 30.1’ from the
MSHA r/w to the nearest parking edge where the prior plan showed 25.3’.
Engineering/Planning asks again if the 8 parking spaces that provide perpendicular parking to 213,
Immediately after the drive through exit:
1. Are all 8 needed?
2. The spaces could be parallel (to the existing paved path) and/or diagonal to reduce potential
backups from the drive through? Especially in the event that they are used as drive through
pick up spots.
5. TAC Review: “• Trash collection for lot P is needed. Bring the entrance in normal (90
degrees) to the curbline of Laser Drive. Heat signatures coming off the parking lots at the
shopping center are of concern. The Town would like to see the parking lot on lot P broken
up, there are excess spaces.”
Engineering/Planning response: Thank you for the corral and the much better parking plan for
Lot “P”. The elimination of the service road on the original plan is a vast improvement overall.
6. TAC Review: “• Loading zones or spaces proposed at the rear of the two lot P buildings?
Designations, if so”
Engineering/Planning response: Thanks for depicting the parking behind the 15,000 s.f. building
on Lot “P”. Employee parking and loading zone access are an improvement.
7. TAC Review: “• North American vertical information on North arrow needed on site plan.”
Engineering/Planning response: Now shown
8. TAC Review: “• The proper width of pedestrian pathway needs to be shown (35’).”
Applicant reply : “The original easement for the pedestrian path was established as 30-ft wide.
A 5-ft wide right of way dedication to SHA has was completed in February of 2017 (SM 56/27
A-B) resulting in an on lot easement width of 25-ft.”
5

Engineering/Planning response: See above for Planning Engineering Response to Number 4,
which includes: … This action does not affect the path easement which runs parallel to and 30’
from the highway r/w and does not peremptorily make the Town’s required 30’ easement 25’. This
is a question for our Town Attorney to further contemplate In any event, it is recommended that
the applicant amend the plats and depict the full 30’ as it now would have no material effect on the
existing layout which now shows 30.1’ from the MSHA r/w to the nearest parking edge where the
prior plan showed 25.3’.
9. TAC Review: “• Subdivision – Minor is 4 lots or less fronting on a public street. The subject
lots front on a private street. “
Engineering/Planning response: Acknowledged – Applicant to review the subdivision
categorization with the town following the Concept Plan Review.
10. TAC Review: “• Street trees should be consistent with road work”
Engineering/Planning response: Acknowledged – A landscape plan will be developed following
Concept review. The street trees will be included per the originally approved plans for Laser Drive.
Additional Further Comments:
• Further technical review/comments will be deferred to the Preliminary Site Plan stage.
• Should the concept plan be approved, the applicant will be required to submit a Preliminary
Site Plan for review and approval by the Planning Commission.
• Should the Preliminary Site Plan be approved, the applicant shall submit a Final Site Plan
for review and approval by the Planning Commission. The Final Site Plan may be approved
as proposed, approved with conditions, or rejected by the Planning Commission.
• In addition to a Town of Centreville Building Permit and a Zoning Use and Occupancy
Permit, the applicant will be required to obtain a Queen Anne’s County Grading Permit for
the project and submit any County required plans for erosion and sediment control and
stormwater management. Please be aware that the responses to Concept Subdivision and
6

Concept Subdivision review by Trey Porter (Queen Anne’s County) are Stormwater
management issues that the applicant will follow up with Mr. Porter about.
• During preliminary and final site plan review the project will be required to demonstrate
compliance with all applicable Town regulations.
• As noted in Comment #1 above: Town Council’s consideration of Water and Sewer
allocations will not take place until after final site plan approval.
7

MEMORANDUM
TO: TOWN OF CENTREVILLE FROM: STACEY DAHLSTROM, AICP
PLANNING COMMISSION SD
SENIOR PLANNER, EPR FOR
CENTREVILLE
ORGANIZATION: CENTREVILLE MD DATE: AUGUST 15, 2024
Re: Amendment to Final Site Plan for a Revised
Outdoor Pool and associated pool support
structures etc. at the Young Men’s Christian
Association of the Chesapeake, Inc. (YMCA)
 URGENT X FOR YOUR USE  PLEASE COMMENT PLEASE REPLY PLEASE
RECYCLE
Introduction
The applicant seeks to amend the Final Approved Site Plan for the YMCA, proposing to
amend/expand the configuration of the proposed outdoor pool (originally identified as Phase 2). The
modification to the pool is proposed to be larger in order to accommodate a wider array of users.
Additionally, the amendment proposes to modify the previously anticipated pool support/
maintenance building to include an open-air pavilion, a bathroom facility and a reception area for
check in.
As provided in Section 170-47D, the Planning and Zoning Commission’s role is to review and
approve, conditionally approve, or reject an amended site plan. Review, comment and feedback is
important to assist in further consideration as the project is reviewed and to avoid confusion.
Future Land Use (FLU) and Zoning: Institutional (FLU) and General Commercial C-2 (Zoning)
As you may recall, this area is NOT in the critical area.
This application was not reviewed by the Town of Centreville Technical Advisory Committee but
has been provided to them and any further comments and information may be available for
Planning Commission’s consideration at the meeting. Additionally, since this is an amendment to
an approved site plan, the items required for site plan approval are required to be able to best
ascertain the impacts if any of the proposed changes. One example, which the applicant has been
informed of and may be able to provide for Planning Commission at your meeting is per 170-47
1

For your convenience the Site Plan review checklist developed for our use in Planning Commission
review is per 170-47 (3) r. - A detailed drawing showing:
…
r. Elevations, which indicate the exterior appearance and materials to be used in each structure
within the site plan. [Added 4-5-2007 by Ord. No. 1-07]”
For your convenience Site Plan Review Checklist – Overview (170-47) is provided at the conclusion
of this memo. In addition to the comments provided below, some additional items for clarification
have been noted in the Checklist that the Planning Commission should consider.
Previously approved site plan and Planning Commission action item
Phase 2 area on Site Plan Planning Commission Reviewed and approved April 21, 2021
2

April 21, 2021 Centreville Planning Commission Minutes
“ Approved the Final Site Plan, YMCA, 210 Vincit Street, with the Planning Commission allowing relief
of 170-32(B)(2) & (3) – Parking Requirements being to the side and rear of building to allow for front
of building parking, and relief of parking space requirements as presented on Final Site Plan.
Additional conditions of approval being: 1. PWA to provide completion of Little Kidwell during phase
1 on site development. 2. Removal of Right of Way at Green Street stub and replace with a
continuation of the buffer yard.”
Comments
1. As noted above, elevations for the expanded pool area and enlarged building to consist of
pavilion, check in area and bathroom facilities has been requested and may be provided for
Planning Commission’s consideration.
2. The pool 3D images provided in the application show several permanent or semi-permanent
pool recreational features, tube slide (in the NW Corner) and 2-3 recreational fountain like
items in the shallow end. Having those incorporated into the renderings that include the
existing and proposed structures will help best understand how it will fit together and any
visual harmony that can be obtained. Additionally, may assist in understanding if additional
landscape buffering may be desired.
3. Noting several Queen Annes County Stormwater Management comments that considered
the original pool concept, the applicant needs to verify with them that the proposed
amendment doesn’t need any updates to stormwater management requirements.
4. Lot Coverage – Impervious Surface Coverage on the site with the proposed site plan
amendment is noted to be almost 30%, it appears the original approved site plan was
approximately twenty six percent. The applicant should help clarify/confirm how the
change from 26.1 percent with the propped amendment becomes 29.3 percent impervious
surface/lot coverage. It’s the Town’s understanding from discussions with YMCA Regional
staff that future pickle ball courts may be desired. The applicant should let the Town know
how the future pickle ball courts and any as of yet unnamed improvements might be
accommodated and planned for regarding lot coverage, pervious/impervious surface
changes and overall harmony with existing development.
5. Regarding the Bathroom facility, equivalent dwelling unit information and review by
Centreville Public Works Department has been requested.
6. As noted additional comments from Centreville Town Staff may be provided.
7. The Planning Commission should consider the site plan review requirements (checklist
provided below) in case there is additional information or items that should be asked of the
applicant for your best consideration of this proposed site plan amendment.
3

Additional Consideration
Planning Commission may wish to review the items provided to ensure that enough information is
included to be able to address site plan review requirements for the proposed site plan amendment
and request additional information as appropriate.
Site Plan Review Checklist – Overview - items already requested are highlighted in light blue:
170-47 Site Plans
D. Procedural items
1. Site plans shall be prepared and certified by an
engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land
surveyor duly registered to practice in the State
of Maryland or equivalent certification.
2. All site plans shall clearly show the information
required by this section.
3. If such plans are prepared in more than one sheet,
match lines shall clearly indicate where the
several sheets join, and an index sheet shall be
required.
4. Every site plan shall show the name and address
of the owner and developer, the election district,
North point, date, scale of the drawing, and the
number of sheets.
At least Five clearly legible copies submitted to Centreville
Planning and Zoning Commission
C. Information required to be included in the site plan.
2. An area or vicinity map at a scale of not smaller
than one-inch equals 2,000 feet and showing
such information as the names and numbers of
adjoining roads, streams, bodies of water,
railroads, subdivisions, election districts, or
other landmarks sufficient to clearly identify the
location of the property.
4

3. A boundary survey plat of the entire site at a
scale not smaller than one inch equals 100 feet
unless otherwise specified by the Planning and
Zoning Commission showing the following:
a. Existing topography at two- or five-foot contour
intervals.
b. Slopes in excess of 15% (CA only). Not CA – N/A
c. Existing and proposed regraded surface of the land.
d. Location of natural features such as streams,
major ravines, drainage patterns, within the area to
be disturbed by construction and the location of
trees measuring greater than 12 inches in diameter
to be retained.
e. Floodplain boundaries (one-hundred-year).
f. Location and areal extent of all soils with septic Not CA – N/A
limitations; wet soils; hydric soils; and soils with
hydric properties as shown on the County Soil
Survey (CA only).
4. A detailed drawing showing:
a. Location, proposed use, and height of all buildings
(delineate all existing buildings and structures);
b. Location of all parking and loading areas with
ingress and egress drives thereto;
c. Location of outdoor storage (if any);
d. Location and type of recreational facilities (if any);
e. Location of all existing or proposed site
improvements, including storm drains, culverts,
retaining walls, fences, stormwater management
facilities as well as any sediment and erosion
control structures (information on shore erosion
shall include the existing shoreline management
designation as shown on the Town of Centreville
Critical Area Program Map, existing structures,
their condition, and areas for proposed structural
and nonstructural controls, shown on the boundary
survey plat, at a scale of at least one inch equals 100
feet);
f Description, method, and location of water supply
and sewerage disposal facilities;
g Location, size, and type of all signs;
5

h The location, size, and type of vehicular entrances
to the site;
i The location of the Critical Area District boundary, Not CA – N/A
the Buffer and other Buffer areas, open space areas,
and forested areas;
j The location of all Habitat Protection Areas (CA Not CA – N/A
only);
k. The location of all contiguous forested areas Not CA – N/A
adjacent to the site that are linked to forested areas
on the development site, i.e., hedgerows, forest
patches or other wildlife corridors (CA only);
l The location of agricultural fields, barren lands,
pasture, etc.
m The location of tidal and nontidal wetlands on the
site;
n The location of existing water-dependent facilities
on and adjacent to the site, including the number of
existing slips and moorings on the site (CA only);
o The location and extent of existing and/or proposed
erosion abatement approaches;
p The location of anadromous fish spawning Not CA – N/A
stream(s) on or adjacent to the site and a delineation
of the watershed area of the stream on the site (CA
only); and
q A detailed drawing locating shore erosion Not CA – N/A
abatement techniques to the included with the site
plan (CA only).
r Elevations, which indicate the exterior appearance Requested 8/15/24
and materials to be used in each structure within the
site plan. [Added 4-5-2007 by Ord. No. 1-07]
5. Computations of:
a Total lot area;
b Building floor area for each type of proposed use;
c Building coverage in percentage;
d Road area;
e Number and area of off-street parking and loading
spaces;
f Total site area in the Critical Area District (CA Not CA – N/A
only);
g Total man-caused impervious surfaces areas and
the percentage of site these occupy;
6

h Separate computations of the total acres of existing Not CA – N/A
forest cover in the Buffer and in the Critical Area
(CA only);
i Proposed agricultural open space areas;
j Proposed forest open space areas; and
k Total area of the site that will be temporarily Not CA – N/A
disturbed during development and the total area
that will be permanently disturbed. "Disturbed" is
defined as any activity occurring on an area which
may result in the permanent loss of or damage to
existing natural vegetation (CA only).
6. Commercial or industrial uses must include:
a. Specific uses proposed;
b. Maximum number of employees for which
buildings are designed;
c. Type of energy to be used for any manufacturing
processes;
d. Type of wastes or by-products to be produced by
any manufacturing process;
e. Proposed method of disposal of such wastes or by-
products; and
f. Location of outdoor lighting facilities.
7. In addition to the information above, site plans shall be accompanied by the following:
a. A Forest Management Plan including the Not CA – N/A
comments of the Bay Watershed Forester (CA
only);
b. A Habitat Protection Plan including the comments Not CA – N/A
of the Maryland Forest, Park and Wildlife Service
(CA only);
c. An executed cooperator's agreement with the Soil Not CA – N/A
Conservation District or Farm Plan, as applicable
(CA only);
d. A Stormwater Management Plan;
e. A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan;
f A Planting Plan, as required; and
g An Environmental Assessment Report which provides a coherent statement of how the
proposed development addresses the goals and objectives of the Centreville Critical Area
Program (CA only). At a minimum the environmental assessment shall include:
(1) A statement of existing conditions, e.g., the Not CA – N/A
amount and types of forest cover, the amount and
type of wetlands, a discussion of existing
7

agricultural activities on the site, the soil types, the
topography, etc;
(2) A discussion of the proposed development Not CA – N/A
project, including number and type of residential
units, amount of impervious surfaces, proposed
sewer treatment and water supply, acreage devoted
to development, proposed open space and habitat
protection areas;
(3) A discussion of the proposed development's
impacts on water quality and Habitat Protection
Areas; and
(4) Documentation of all correspondence and
findings.
8. Other information as requested by the Town.
8

TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE
ORDINANCE 08-2024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE ADOPTING
A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE APPLICATION FOR, APPROVAL
OF, CONSTRUCTION OF, EXPANSION OF, PROCESSING OF, OR ISSUANCE
OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR ANY SUBDIVISION, SITE PLAN, OR
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR ANY RESIDENTIAL OR MIXED-
USE PROJECT WHERE THE ANTICIPATED EQUIVALENT DWELLING
UNITS (EDUS) EXCEED SEVEN (7) EDUS FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT
PENDING CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF REVISED ZONING
ORDINANCE PROVISIONS AS THE TOWN COUNCIL MAY CONSIDER
ADVISABLE AND TO ADOPT AN UPDATED CAPACITY MANAGEMENT
PLAN AND SEWER ALLOCATION POLICY
WHEREAS, the Town Council of Centreville has the authority under Section 5-213 of the Local
Government Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, to enact and administer a zoning
ordinance, which is Chapter 170 of the Centreville Town Code;
WHEREAS, Section 4-102(6) of the Land Use Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland
authorizes the Town Council of Centreville to develop and adopt zoning restrictions to promote
the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community, including the location and use of
buildings, signs and structures on the land;
WHEREAS, the recently adopted Town of Centreville Comprehensive Plan: 2040 (“Comp
Plan”) identifies five (5) large infill areas for residential development with a development
potential of approximately 749 units (Comp Plan p. 18, Table 2). This exceeds the capacity
remaining in the Town’s Wastewater Treatment Plant until a new plant is built;
WHEREAS, the Comp Plan calls for implementation of Complete Neighborhoods. It states that
“[t]o implement complete neighborhoods for the future, the Town will update its land
development regulations to incentivize/encourage creative design and development of complete
neighborhoods. . .” (Comp Plan p. 27);
WHEREAS, the Town is in the process of upgrading its Wastewater Treatment Plant from its
current capacity of 542,000 gpd to 1,000,000 gpd;
WHEREAS, the new Wastewater Treatment Plant is expected to be completed at the end of
2029;
WHEREAS, the current Capacity Management Plan and Sewer Allocation Policy provide that
allocations are available on a “first come-first served” basis;
WHEREAS, given the 5.5 years until the expected completion of the new Wastewater
Treatment Plant, the Town would like to update its Capacity Management Plan and Sewer
Allocation Policy to better prioritize allocations for desired development;

WHEREAS, the Town requires time to ensure that the appropriate study and desired public
input can be obtained before establishing effective and enduring textual amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance and updating the Capacity Management Plan and Sewer Allocation Policy;
WHEREAS, the acceptance and processing of an application, subdivision, site plan and/or
issuance of other zoning approvals or building permits, before appropriate study of the matter,
obtaining desired public input, and consideration and approval of meaningful and effective Town
ordinances and regulations governing the matter, would frustrate the Town’s ability to protect the
health, safety, and welfare of the residents to the Town and be adverse to the orderly
development of the Town;
WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that a temporary moratorium, for a term of six (6)
months, is a reasonable length of time to study, receive input and adopt any revisions to the Zoning
Ordinance and update the Capacity Management Plan and Sewer Allocation Policy as necessary;
and
WHEREAS, the Centreville Planning and Zoning Commission considered the matter at its
_________________, 2024 meeting and has recommended that the Town Council approve this
Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of Centreville:
Section 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of
this Ordinance.
Section 2. A moratorium on the application for, consideration of, approval of, construction of,
expansion of, processing of, or issuance of permits for any subdivision, site plan, or building permit
application for residential and mixed-use projects where the anticipated equivalent dwelling units
(EDUs) exceed seven (7) EDUs, is hereby imposed for a period of six (6) months.
Section 3. During the moratorium, the Town (including the Town Planner’s office, the Building
Department, the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Appeals, the Town staff, and the
Town Council) shall not process, consider, review, or approve any application, permit, or other
approval under the Town Zoning Ordinance for any subdivision, site plan, or building permit
application for a residential or mixed-use project where the anticipated EDUs exceed seven (7)
EDUs.
Section 4. The moratorium shall apply to applications currently pending before the Town, as well
as, applications filed after the effective date of this Ordinance. However, it does not apply to any
application as of the effective date of this Ordinance that has received subdivision approval, site
plan approval, and/or a building permit and which has already been approved for allocations by
the Town Council.
Section 5. This moratorium is adopted to allow sufficient time for the Town to accomplish the
following:
a. Receive public input, specifically to have the Planning Commission review
this issue and provide recommendations;
b. Consider any revisions to the Zoning Ordinance;

c. Update the Capacity Management Plan and Sewer Allocation Policy; and
d. Consider all such other matters as the Town Council, Planning and Zoning
Commission, and Town staff deem appropriate.
Section 6. The Town Council shall have and reserves the right to extend or modify this
moratorium for such additional period or periods and on such terms and conditions as it deems
necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the Town of Centreville.
Section 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or of the codes
hereby adopted are, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or those codes.
Section 8. This Ordinance shall become effective twenty (20) days after its enactment.
ATTEST: THE TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE
____________________________________
R. Gaye Adams Ashley Heffernan Kaiser, Esq., President
Town Clerk
_____________________________________
First Reading: Eric B. Johnson, Jr., Vice President
Second Reading:
Enacted:
Effective: _____________________________________
Daniel B. Worth, Member
_____________________________________
Jim A. Beauchamp, Member
______________________________________
Jeffrey D. Kiel, Member

TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE
ORDINANCE NO 09-2024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE AMENDING
THE TOWN OF CENTREVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE, WHICH IS CHAPTER
170 OF THE TOWN CODE, TO UPDATE THE CANNABIS PROVISIONS IN
ORDER TO ADMINISTER AND ENFORCE THE TOWN’S ZONING ORDINANCE
MORE EFFECTIVELY
WHEREAS, the Town Council has the authority under Section 5-213 of the Local
Government Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, to adopt zoning regulations;
WHEREAS, Section 4-102(6) et seq. of the Land Use Article of the Annotated Code of
Maryland enables the Town Council to divide the Town into districts and zones;
WHEREAS, the State of Maryland passed legislation legalizing recreational cannabis
under certain limitations, which is known as the Cannabis Reform Act (House Bill 556/Senate
Bill 516) and was signed into law and became effective on July 1, 2023;
WHEREAS, the State of Maryland further refined the limitations on cannabis (House
Bill 805/Senate Bill 537) which was signed into law and became effective on June 1, 2024;
WHEREAS, the Centreville Zoning Ordinance currently only addresses medical
cannabis, and does not address recreational cannabis;
WHEREAS, some of the existing standards in the Centreville Zoning Ordinance need to
be updated to be in compliance with State law;
WHEREAS, Section 170-62 of the Code of the Town of Centreville provides for
amendments to the regulations, restrictions and boundaries set forth in Chapter 170 of the Code;
WHEREAS, the Centreville Planning and Zoning Commission considered the matter at
its _________________, 2024 meeting and has recommended that the Town Council approve this
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council held a public hearing on the zoning amendment on
______________, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Town Council of Centreville:
Section 1. Article IX, Chapter 170 of the Centreville Town Code, Section 170-68
Definitions is hereby amended to modify the following definition:
Medical Cannabis Licensed Dispensary is an entity licensed by the Maryland Medical
Cannabis Commission that acquires, possesses, repackages, processes, transfers, transports, sells,
distributes, or dispenses, products containing medical cannabis, related supplies, related products
including tinctures, aerosols, oils, or ointments, or educational materials for use by a qualifying
patient or caregiver. Such products and supplies shall not include recreational or any other
Ord-09-2024-Cannabis.docx Page | 1

cannabis that is not approved by a provider registered with the Maryland Medical Cannabis
Commission for use by a patient registered with the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission
with a valid written certification.
Section 2. Article IX, Chapter 170 of the Centreville Town Code, Section 170-68
Definitions is hereby amended to add the following definition:
On-site cannabis consumption establishment – an indoor or outdoor location, which is
open to the public, and licensed to allow individuals who are 21 years or older to consume
cannabis on its premises. On-site consumption establishments shall be prohibited in all
zoning districts.
Section 3. Article IX, Chapter 170 of the Centreville Town Code, is hereby amended to
add a new Section 170-23.A.13 for Permitted Uses in the General Commercial District C-2:
13. Cannabis Licensed Dispensary, subject to the following provisions:
a. The boundaries of property used as a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary
shall be at least 100 feet from any property with a residential use;
b. The boundaries of property used as a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary
shall be at least 500 feet from a pre-existing school, playground,
recreation center, library, public park, or place of worship;
c. The boundaries of property used as a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary
shall be at least 1,000 feet from property with another Cannabis
Licensed Dispensary;
d. A Cannabis Licensed Dispensary shall not be permitted as an accessory
use; and
e. Parking requirements for a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary shall be at
least equivalent to the minimum parking requirements applicable to
retail businesses.
Section 4. Article IX, Chapter 170 of the Centreville Town Code, is hereby amended to
add a new Section 170-24.A.8 for Permitted Uses in the Intense Commercial District C-3:
8. Cannabis Licensed Dispensary, subject to the following provisions:
a. The boundaries of property used as a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary
shall be at least 100 feet from any property with a residential use;
b. The boundaries of property used as a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary
shall be at least 500 feet from a pre-existing school, playground,
recreation center, library, public park, or place of worship;
c. The boundaries of property used as a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary
shall be at least 1,000 feet from property with another Cannabis
Licensed Dispensary;
d. A Cannabis Licensed Dispensary shall not be permitted as an accessory
use; and
e. Parking requirements for a Cannabis Licensed Dispensary shall be at
least equivalent to the minimum parking requirements applicable to
retail businesses.
Ord-09-2024-Cannabis.docx Page | 2

Section 5. Article IX, Chapter 170 of the Centreville Town Code, Section 170-29.F.1.r
is hereby amended to modify the following permitted uses to the Planned Business
Development District (PBD):
r. Medical Cannabis Licensed Dispensary, subject to the following provisions:
(1) The boundaries of property used as a Medical Cannabis Licensed
Dispensary shall be at least 500 100 feet from any property with a
residential use;
(2) The boundaries of property used as a Medical Cannabis Licensed
Dispensary shall be at least 1,000 500 feet from property with any
pre-existing school, playground, recreation center, library, public
park, or place of worship;
(3) The boundaries of property used as a Medical Cannabis Licensed
Dispensary shall be at least 2,500 1,000 feet from property with
another Medical Cannabis Licensed Dispensary;
[4] This use shall not have an on-site prescribing authority for the
purpose of issuing written certifications for medical cannabis;
(5)(4) A Medical Cannabis Licensed Dispensary shall not be permitted as
an accessory use; and
(6)(5) Parking requirements for a Medical Cannabis Licensed Dispensary
shall be at least equivalent to the minimum parking requirements
applicable to medical services retail businesses.
(Language to be deleted from the existing Ordinance is indicated in strikethrough format and
language to added is indicated by bold italics text)
Section 6. If any section, clause, paragraph, sentence or phrase of the Ordinance or
the application thereof to any person, property, or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional
by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity or unconstitutionality shall in no way affect
other provisions or any other application of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the
invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and for this purpose the provisions of this
Ordinance are declared severable.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective twenty (20) days after its enactment.
Ord-09-2024-Cannabis.docx Page | 3

ATTEST: THE TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE
____________________________________
R. Gaye Adams Ashley Heffernan Kaiser, Esq., President
Town Clerk
_____________________________________
First Reading: Eric B. Johnson, Jr., Vice President
Second Reading:
Enacted:
Effective: _____________________________________
Daniel B. Worth, Member
_____________________________________
Jim A. Beauchamp, Member
______________________________________
Jeffrey D. Kiel, Member
Ord-09-2024-Cannabis.docx Page | 4

ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS
June 1 - 30, 2024
Permit # Applicant Owner Address Type Issue Date*
BP-48-24 Diamond State Pole Bldgs Amanda Pinder 116 Kings Crt. pole building 6/11/2024
BP-49-24 John Abbrescia John Abbrescia 348 Kidwell Ave. extending driveway 6/11/2024
BP-50-24 Solar Energy World Mary Henley 401 Kidwell Ave. roof mounted solar 6/20/2024
BP-51-24 TL Fence Angelica Lockwood 221 Northfield Way fence 6/13/2024
BP-52-24 Island Remodeling LLC BMW Investments 300 Hammond St Remodel mobile home/trailer 6/13/2024
BP-53-24 Brian Martinez Brian Martinez 116 East Meadow Dr. Fence 6/20/2024
BP-54-24 David Burtis Bonnie Doss 240 Harmony Way replace roof 6/13/2024
BP-58-24 Carroll Bros Contracting LLC Kevin & Jackie McCann 546 Brookfield Dr demolish swimming pool 6/13/2024
BP-59-24 Economy Restoration, LLC Patricia Glaws 620 Chesterfield Ave replace roof 6/20/2024
BP-60-24 Shore Roofing, LLC David Struss 573 Brookfield Way replace roof 6/20/2024
* based on the approval date by Zoning Administrator

ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS
July 1 - 31, 2024
Permit # Applicant Owner Address Type Issue Date*
BP-61-24 Long Home Products Corletha Williams 227 Little Kidwell Ave. replace roof 7/2/2024
BP-63-24 AKJ, Inc. Thomas Rohe 302 Orchestra replace roof 7/2/2024
BP-64-24 T L Fence Kurt Brewer 2916 4H Park Rd. fence 7/17/2024
BP-66-24 Island Remodeling LLC Samuel Diphilippo 202 Tilghman Ave deck 7/12/2024
BP-67-24 Exterior Home Solutions Kevin Hogan 125 Fieldcroft Way replace roof 7/12/2024
BP-68-24 Jennifer Minor Jennifer Minor 310 Chesterfield Ave. Fence 7/12/2024
BP-69-24 Shore Roofing Solutions, LLC Sue Hoffman 138 Harmony Way replace roof 7/12/2024
BP-70-24 Wells Home Improvements Steve Gehring 122 Encore Ct. replace roof 7/12/2024
BP-71-24 Mid Atlantic Deck & Fence James Cook 123 S. Commerce fence 7/12/2024
BP-72-24 Fence & Deck Connection Brittany Brooks & Stephen Smith 109 East Meadow Dr. Fence 7/17/2024
BP-73-24 Rozaline Spence Rozaline Spence 314 Little Kidwell Ave fence 7/17/2024
BP-75-24 Joseph Comer Joseph Comer 113 Chesterfield Ave. detached garage 7/23/2024
BP-76-24 Economy Restoration Patrick Lee 202 Providence Court replace roof 7/23/2024
BP-78-24 Jeremy Lins Construction Joseph Brown 122 Concerto Ave. replace roof 7/26/2024
* based on the approval date by Zoning Administrator