april 16 2025 planning commission packet
Document April 16, 2025 · 91 page(s)
Read as text View original PDF ↗ Meeting
This packet contains schematic design drawings and stormwater calculations for Draper’s Liquors (schematic design progress dated 3/21/25) prepared by Torchio Architects, included in the April 16, 2025 planning commission materials. Drawings show a Level 1 floor plan with spaces labeled for storage, tasting, beer cave, coolers/walk-in, deli case and prep, kitchen (range, fryers, oven), sales area, office, accessible toilets, bike rack, awnings, and exterior materials/finishes (board & batten siding, cementitious siding, stone base, AZEK cornice, standing seam metal roof) plus signage locations/sizes and building elevations (upper parapet 22'6", lower parapet 19'0"). The Maryland ESD (Environmentally Sensitive Design) and 10% phosphorus removal worksheet (updated 3/26/25) lists the site area as 1.084 acres, existing impervious 0.290 acres and proposed impervious 0.476 acres (post-development imperviousness 43.9%), with a calculated ESD rainfall target 1.80" and ESD runoff volume 3,153 cf. The water quality volume (WQv) is shown as 0 cf, the phosphorus removal requirement (RR) as 0.49 lbs P/yr, and the worksheet lists soil type C (100%); the nonstructural and micro-scale practice tables in the packet show no credited practices or selected treatment volumes.
Draper’s Liquorsschematic designTorchio Architectsfloor planelevationsESD phosphorus removalimpervious surfacesignage
AI-generated summary — verify against the source document.
Show the raw extracted text
Exactly as extracted, unformatted — for checking against the original. The readable version is easier to read.
104' - 0" "0 - '54 52' - 0" "6 - '41 14' - 8 1/2" STORAGE TASTING BEER CAVE COOLER ICE ELECTRIC CARTS HALL CHEESE SODA VESTIBULE J.C. H.C. TOILET H.C. TOILET RACK ROOM DELI CASE WALK IN COOLER OFFICE KITCHEN FRYER 10' - 10" SALES FRYER DELI PREP. RANGE STORAGE OVEN FREEZER YALPSID MOP SINK/RACK ICE C HAND SINK O U N T E R S/S TABLE S/S TABLE HAND SINK "0 - '94 22' - 5" "2/1 6 - '61 "8/7 7 - '11 11' - 0" 48' - 0" 4' - 11 7/8" 26' - 0" 26' - 0" "6 - '41 "0 - '02 AWNING ABOVE BIKE RACK AWNING ABOVE AWNING ABOVE AWNING ABOVE AWNING ABOVE Level 1 1 1/4" = 1'-0" :: Draper's Liqours :: Schematic Design Progress :: 3.21.25 SK-1 205 E. Water Street, Suite A, Centreville, Maryland 21617 - 410.758.1000 COPYRIGHT TORCHIO ARCHITECTS, INC. 2025 BOARD & BATTEN SIDING SIGNAGE (PER CODE) 25 SF+12 SF+12 SF AZEK CORNICE Upper Parapit 22' - 6" AZEK CORNICE AZEK CORNICE Lower Parapit 19' - 0" STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF Truss High 14' - 6" CEMENTITIOUS SIDING Truss Bearing 10' - 6" WALL MOUNTED LIGHT (TYP.) CEMENTITIOUS SIDING ALUM. STOREFRONT CANVAS AWNINGS STONE BASE STONE BASE Level 1 0' - 0" East West 1 4 ALUM. STOREFRONT BIKE RACK TRASH RECEP. 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" Upper Parapit 22' - 6" AZEK CORNICE AZEK CORNICE AZEK CORNICE Lower Parapit 19' - 0" WALL MOUNTED LIGHT (TYP.) Truss High CANAVAS AWNING 14' - 6" Truss Bearing 10' - 6" CEMENTITIOUS SIDING CEMENTITIOUS SIDING ALUM. D.S. (TYP.) ALUM. STOREFRONT STONE BASE Level 1 0' - 0" TRASH RECEP. North 2 1/4" = 1'-0" Upper Parapit 22' - 6" AZEK CORNICE Lower Parapit 19' - 0" WALL MOUNTED LIGHT (TYP.) CANVAS AWNING Truss Low 13' - 0" Truss Bearing CEMENTITIOUS SIDING 10' - 6" STONE BASE Level 1 0' - 0" South 3 1/4" = 1'-0" :: Draper's Liqours :: Schematic Design Progress :: 3.21.25 SK-2 205 E. Water Street, Suite A, Centreville, Maryland 21617 - 410.758.1000 COPYRIGHT TORCHIO ARCHITECTS, INC. 2025 Perspective 1 :: Draper's Liqours :: Schematic Design Progress :: 3.21.25 SK-3 205 E. Water Street, Suite A, Centreville, Maryland 21617 - 410.758.1000 COPYRIGHT TORCHIO ARCHITECTS, INC. 2025 "3 - '4 6' - 1 3/16" "2/1 4 - '1 Sign - Draper Bros. 1 1" = 1'-0" 9' - 0" Sign - Subs Shells Spirits 2 1" = 1'-0" :: Draper's Liqours :: Schematic Design Progress :: 3.21.25 SK-4 205 E. Water Street, Suite A, Centreville, Maryland 21617 - 410.758.1000 COPYRIGHT TORCHIO ARCHITECTS, INC. 2025 Maryland ESD Calculations and 10% Phosphorus Removal Last Update: 12/3/2013 Project Name: DRAPER'S LIQUOR STORE Date: 26-Mar-25 data input cells calculation cells Step 1: Complete ESD Implementation Checklist Check all of the Following ESD Practices That Were Implemented at Site Yes - No - N/A Environmental Mapping Was Conducted at Site Prior to Layout YES Natural Areas Were Conserved (e.g., forests, wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains) YES Stream, Wetland and Shoreline Buffers Were Reserved YES Disturbance of Permeable Soils Was Minimized N/A Natural Flow Paths Were Maintained Across the Site YES Building Layout Was Fingerprinted to Reduce Clearing and Grading at Site YES Site Grading Promoted Sheetflow From Impervious Areas to Pervious Ones YES Site Design Was Evaluated to Reduce Creation of Needless Impervious Cover YES Site Design Was Evaluated to Maximize Disconnection of Impervious Cover YES Site Design Was Evaluated to Identify Potential Hotspot Generating Area for Stormwater Treatment N/A Erosion and Sediment Control Practices and Post Construction Stormwater Management Practices Were Integrated into a Comprehensive Plan YES Tree Planting Was Used at the Site to Convert Turf Areas into Forest N/A Step 3: Calculate Phosphorous Removal Requirement, RR for Critical Area Sites Step 2: Calculate Site Imperviousness and Water Quality Volume, WQv (for redevelopment) Development Category (for 10%) Redevelopment Site Area, A (acres) 1.084 Existing Impervious Surface Area (acres) 0.290 New Development Proposed Impervious Surface Area (acres) 0.476 Average Annual Predevelopment Load, Lpre (lbs P / yr) 0.54 Rainfall Depth, P (in) 1.0 Redevelopment: Existing Imperviousness, I pre 26.8% Predevelopment Runoff Coefficient, Rv pre 0.29 Proposed Imperviousness, I post 43.9% Phosphorous Mean Concentration, C (mg/L) 0.3 Average Annual Predevelopment Load, L pre (lbs P / yr) 0.77 Water Quality Calculation for Redevelopment Only Required Treatment Area (acres) 0.00 Post-Development Runoff Coefficient, Rv post 0.45 Runoff Coefficient, Rv 0.95 Average Annual Post-Development Load, L post (lbs P / yr) 1.18 Water Quality Volume, WQv (cf) 0 Removal Requirement, RR (lbs P / yr) 0.49 Step 4: Calculate Environmental Site Design (ESD) Rainfall Target, P E Development Category (for ESD) New Development % Soil Type A 0% % Soil Type B 0% % Soil Type C 100% % Soil Type D 0% Pre-Developed Condition, RCN woods 70 Soil Type A ESD Rainfall Target, P E (in) 0.00 Soil Type B ESD Rainfall Target, P E (in) 0.00 Soil Type C ESD Rainfall Target, P E (in) 1.80 Soil Type D ESD Rainfall Target, P E (in) 0.00 Maximum P E (in) 2.7 Site ESD Rainfall Target, P E (in) 1.80 ESD Runoff Depth, Q (in) 0.80 E ESD Runoff Volume, ESDv (cf) 3,153 Total Treatment Volume (cf) 3,153 Step 5: Select Nonstructural Practices to Treat the ESD Rainfall Target Critical Area Credits WQv or ESDv Baseline Direct WQv or from Up- Phosphorous Average Adjusted Contributing Drainage ESDv Received by Gradient WQV or ESDv credit Runoff Volume Removal Removal Efficiency P Load to Practice Load Reduction Remaining Load Nonstructural Practices PE Credit Description Area (sf) Practice (cf) Practices (cf) PE Credit (in) (cf) Remaining (cf) Efficiency Rate (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Up to 1 inch credit provided based upon Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff (A/B Soils) disconnection flow length. 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 50% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Up to 1 inch credit provided based upon Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff (C/D Soils) disconnection flow length. 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 25% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Up to 1 inch credit provided based upon Disconnection of Non-Rooftop Runoff (A/B disconnection and contributing flow Soils) lengths. 0 0 0 0 0 0 50% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Disconnection of Non-Rooftop Runoff (C/D disconnection and contributing flow Soils) lengths. 0 0 0 0 0 0 25% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Up to 1 inch credit provided based upon Sheetflow to Conservation Areas (A/B Soils) conservation area width. 0 0 0 0 0 0 50% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Up to 1 inch credit provided based upon Sheetflow to Conservation Areas (C/D Soils) conservation area width. 0 0 0 0 0 0 25% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Step 6: Select Micro-Scale Practices to Treat the ESD Rainfall Target WQv or ESDv Baseline Direct ESDv from Up- Phosphorous Average Adjusted Contributing Drainage Received by Gradient WQv or ESDv Runoff Volume Removal Removal Efficiency P Load to Practice Load Reduction Remaining Load Micro-Scale Practices PE Credit Description Area (sf) Practice (cf) Practices (cf) credit (cf) Remaining (cf) Efficiency Rate (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Green Roof (Level 1) ESDv credit is based on roof thickness 0 0 N/A 0 0 45% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Green Roof (Level 2) ESDv credit is based on roof thickness 0 0 N/A 0 0 60% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on subbase Pemeable Pavement (A Soils) thickness 0 0 N/A 0 0 80% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on subbase Pemeable Pavement (B Soils) thickness 0 0 N/A 0 0 80% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on subbase Pemeable Pavement (C Soils) thickness 0 0 N/A 0 0 40% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Rainwater Harvesting volume and annual use 0 0 0 0 0 45% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Submerged Gravel Wetlands volume 0 0 0 0 0 60% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Micro-Infiltration volume 0 0 0 0 0 65% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Rain Gardens (A/B Soils) volume 0 0 0 0 0 65% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Rain Gardens (C/D Soils) volume 0 0 0 0 0 25% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Micro-Bioretention (A/B Soils) volume 0 0 0 0 0 75% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Micro-Bioretention (C/D Soils) volume 26,948 4,376 0 3,562 814 50% 62% 1.09 0.68 0.41 ESDv credit is based on design storage Landscape Infiltration volume 0 0 0 0 0 75% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Grass Swales (A/B Soils) volume 0 0 0 0 0 40% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Grass Swales (C/D Soils) volume 0 0 0 0 0 20% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Bio-swales (A/B Soils) volume 0 0 0 0 0 75% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Bio-swales (C/D Soils) volume 0 0 0 0 0 50% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ESDv credit is based on design storage Wet Swales volume 0 0 0 0 0 40% 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Step 7: Check for ESDv to MEP compliance and Revise Site If Necessary Drainage Area Treated (sf) 26,948 WQv or ESDv Treated (cf) 3,562 Total Load Reduction (lbs P / year) 0.68 PE achieved (inches) 2.03 Total Load Reduction Remaining (lbs P / yr) 0.00 Entire ESDv Treated Through Environmental Site Design? YES ESDv Remaining? (cf) 0 If ESDV is not fully treated, is ESD to MEP achieved? ESDv ESDv Runoff Contributing % Received from Up- WQv or Volume Down- Drainage Imperviou by Gradient ESDv Remainin Gradient P Credit Description Area (sf) s Cover Practice Practices Practice Specific Parameter(s) credit (cf) g (cf) Practice E Surface ESDv credit is based on design storage Area (sf) Ponding Depth (ft) Media Depth (ft) volume 26,948 75% 4,376 0 1,370 1 4 3,562 814 Surface ESDv credit is based on design storage Area (sf) Ponding Depth (ft) Media Depth (ft) volume 0 0 0 0 Surface ESDv credit is based on design storage Area (sf) Ponding Depth (ft) Media Depth (ft) volume 0 0 0 0 Surface ESDv credit is based on design storage Area (sf) Ponding Depth (ft) Media Depth (ft) volume 0 0 0 0 Surface ESDv credit is based on design storage Area (sf) Ponding Depth (ft) Media Depth (ft) volume 0 0 0 0 Surface ESDv credit is based on design storage Area (sf) Ponding Depth (ft) Media Depth (ft) volume 0 0 0 0 26,948 4,376 0 3,562 814